Partial elasticities of substitution among capital, labor, and water provide empirical evidence concerning the possibilities of adjusting the techniques of manufacturing to accommodate changing scarcities of water. Empirical estimates of elasticities for the United States are obtained by using a trans-log cost function with SIC two-digit manufacturing data for 1973. Results show that water and labor inputs are good substitutes but that water and capital are complements. Economic implications of this finding are discussed. INTRODUCTION SUBSTITUTING FOR WATER IN PRODUCTIONThe economics of water demand in different sectors of the U.S. economy is a matter of continuing interest for water resources planners and policy makers. Indicative of this is the fact that the National Water Commission [1973] devoted a large portion of its energies to the manifold questions surrounding the demand for water. Empirical studies on the demand for water, however, are substantially less abundant than is justified by the importance of the topic. Because of this it has been common for some time to resort to the assumption of fixed water use coefficients when projecting future demands for water. This is so despite the fact that virtually everyone agrees that projection of future industrial requirements entails such analyses as '(1) an industry-by-industry assessment of available, emerging and potential water use technologies; and (2) an associated appraisal of the potentials for substituting other factor inputs for water in the production process' [Water Resources Council, 1972, p. 8]. This quotation, while stressing the importance of examining water substitution in production relationships, points to engineering-economic types of studies as the appropriate way to proceed. There is another way to study the substitution phenomenon, however: through econometric analysis of aggregate industry data. In this paper we report the results of the first attempt at this kind of approach, in which we estimate the elasticities o• substitution between water anti other productive inputs for the aggregate U.S. manufacturing sector. As such, the study represents another step in analytical thrust that has gained some popularity in recent years: the econometric investigation of aggregate production functions containing natural resources [Berndt and Wood, 1975;Berndt and Jorgenson, 1973;Griffin and Gregory, 1976;Humphrey and Moroney, 1975;Moroney and Toevs, 1977]. While our work must be considered to be preliminary owing to the roughness of the data, certain clear conclusions do stand out. The most surprising conclusion, perhaps, is that water and capital inputs appear to be complements, not substitutes, in the U.S. manufacturing economy.
This paper explores whether natural resource abundance leads, other things equal, to slower growth rates. We distinguish between natural resource dependence (RD) and the natural resource endowment (RE). We estimate three models, using World Bank data on national capital stocks. In a one-equation model we show that RD has a negative effect on growth rates, apparently confirming the main results of the resource "curse" literature. RE, however, has a positive impact on growth. We then estimate a twoequation model, in which the impacts of RE are much weaker. Finally, we estimate a three-equation model, in which the impacts of natural resources on growth disappears.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, University of WisconsinPress are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Land Economics
Abstract:Protecting against terrorist attacks requires making decisions in a world in which attack probabilities are largely unknown. The potential for very large losses encourages a conservative perspective, in particular toward decisions that are robust. But robustness, in the sense of assurance against extreme outcomes, ordinarily is not the only desideratum in uncertain environments. We adopt Yakov Ben-Haim's (2001b) model of information gap decision making to investigate the problem of inspecting a number of similar targets when one of the targets may be attacked, but with unknown probability. We apply this to a problem of inspecting a sample of incoming shipping containers for a terrorist weapon. While it is always possible to lower the risk of a successful attack by inspecting more vessels, we show that robustness against the failure to guarantee a minimum level of expected utility might not be monotonic. Robustness modeling based on expected utility and incorporating inspection costs yields decision protocols that are a useful alternative to traditional risk analysis. INSPECTIONS TO AVERT TERRORISM: ROBUSTNESS UNDER SEVERE UNCERTAINTYAbstract: Protecting against terrorist attacks requires making decisions in a world in which attack probabilities are largely unknown. The potential for very large losses encourages a conservative perspective, in particular toward decisions that are robust. But robustness, in the sense of assurance against extreme outcomes, ordinarily is not the only desideratum in uncertain environments. We adopt Yakov Ben-Haim's (2001b) model of information gap decision making to investigate the problem of inspecting a number of similar targets when one of the targets may be attacked, but with unknown probability. We apply this to a problem of inspecting a sample of incoming shipping containers for a terrorist weapon. While it is always possible to lower the risk of a successful attack by inspecting more vessels, we show that robustness against the failure to guarantee a minimum level of expected utility might not be monotonic. Robustness modeling based on expected utility and incorporating inspection costs yields decision protocols that are a useful alternative to traditional risk analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.