Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) provides the ability to evaluate donor lungs before transplantation. Yet, limited prospective clinical data exist with regard to its potential to recondition unacceptable donor lungs. This paper summarizes the results of a prospective study of lung transplantation using only initially unacceptable donor lungs, which were improved by EVLP for 2-4 h. From March 2010-June 2011, 13 lungs were evaluated ex vivo. Median donor PaO 2 at FiO 2 1.0/PEEP5 was 216 mmHg (range 133-271). Four lungs, all with trauma history, showed no improvement and were discarded. Nine lungs improved to a ΔPO 2 higher than 350 mmHg. Median PvO 2 at final assessment in these lungs was 466 mmHg (range 434-525). These lungs were transplanted with a median total ischemic time of 577 min (range 486-678). None of the patients developed primary graft dysfunction grades 2 or 3 within 72 h after transplantation. One patient with secondary pulmonary hypertension was left on a planned prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation postoperatively. Median intubation time was 2 days. Thirtyday mortality was 0%. During the observation period, 119 patients received standard lung transplantation with comparable perioperative outcome. EVLP has a significant potential to improve the quality of otherwise unacceptable donor lungs.

These findings suggest responder and non-responder behaviour is a result of the addition of clonidine.

The current available evidence is not suited to inform clinical practice. We were unable to determine whether a particular vasopressor is superior to other agents in the treatment of states of shock.

Levobupivacaine is the isolated S(-)-stereoisomer of racemic bupivacaine. Important pharmacodynamic properties of levobupivacaine have not been determined for the femoral three-in-one block. In this randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial, we studied 60 ASA physical status I-III patients scheduled for surgery of the lower limb. A nerve-stimulator-guided three-in-one block was performed as supplemental analgesic therapy with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), levobupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), or levobupivacaine 0.25% (n = 20). Sensory onset time, quality of blockade, and duration of blockade were assessed by pinprick test in the central sensory innervation region of the femoral nerve (distribution of the anterior femoral cutaneous nerve). A rating scale from 100% (normal sensation) to 0% (no sensation at all) as compared with the contralateral leg was used. No significant difference in sensory onset time among the three local anesthetic solutions was observed (mean [95% confidence interval]): bupivacaine 0.5%, 27 min (20-33 min); levobupivacaine 0.5%, 24 min (18-30 min); and levobupivacaine 0.25%, 30 min (23-36 min) (P = 0.49). The analgesic quality of the blockade was also not significantly different among the three groups, whereas a complete sensory block was achieved in significantly fewer patients in the levobupivacaine 0.25% group (P = 0.02). The duration of blockade was significantly shorter with levobupivacaine 0.25% compared with the other groups: bupivacaine 0.5%, 1053 min (802-1304 min); levobupivacaine 0.5%, 1001 min (844-1158 min); and levobupivacaine 0.25%, 707 min (551-863 min) (P = 0.01). Levobupivacaine 0.5% is recommended instead of bupivacaine 0.5% for the three-in-one block.

No abstract

Background: The aim of this post hoc analysis of a large cohort study was to evaluate the association between night-time surgery and the occurrence of intraoperative adverse events (AEs) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Methods: LAS VEGAS (Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Surgery) was a prospective international 1-week study that enrolled adult patients undergoing surgical procedures with general anaesthesia and mechanical ventilation in 146 hospitals across 29 countries. Surgeries were defined as occurring during 'daytime' when induction of anaesthesia was between 8:00 AM and 7:59 PM, and as 'night-time' when induction was between 8:00 PM and 7:59 AM. Results: Of 9861 included patients, 555 (5.6%) underwent surgery during night-time. The proportion of patients who developed intraoperative AEs was higher during night-time surgery in unmatched (43.6% vs 34.1%; P<0.001) and propensity-matched analyses (43.7% vs 36.8%; P¼0.029). PPCs also occurred more often in patients who underwent night-time surgery (14% vs 10%; P¼0.004) in an unmatched cohort analysis, although not in a propensity-matched analysis (13.8% vs 11.8%; P¼0.39). In a multivariable regression model, including patient characteristics and types of surgery and anaesthesia, night-time surgery was independently associated with a higher incidence of intraoperative AEs (odds ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.09e1.90; P¼0.01), but not with a higher incidence of PPCs (odds ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.89e1.90; P¼0.15). Conclusions: Intraoperative adverse events and postoperative pulmonary complications occurred more often in patients undergoing night-time surgery. Imbalances in patients' clinical characteristics, types of surgery, and intraoperative management at night-time partially explained the higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, but not the higher incidence of adverse events. Clinical trial registration: NCT01601223.

No abstract

No abstract