ABSTRACT. A simple quasi one-dimensional model of flowing avalanches is presented. It is a further development of that used in the Swiss Guidelines jor practitioners. It is shown that shearing in avalanche movement is concentrated near the ground and that, due to the geometrical roughness of the ground, a flow resistance proportional to the square of velocity must be taken into account in addition to dry friction. For the change of flow on changing slope angles it is demonstrated that under certain conditions for internal friction a "normal" flow on a flat lower part can no longer be attained; the avalanche behaves like a rigid body.The runout distance is in fair agreement with the Guidelines if a larger internal friction is used . The main differences lie in much smaller deposition depths and smaller velocities during runout.
A quasi-one-dimensional dense-snow avalanche model has been developed to predict avalanche runout and flow velocity in a general two-dimensional terrain. The model contains three different dense-snow-avalanche flow laws. These are: (1) a Voellmy-fluid flow law with longitudinal active/passive straining, (2) a Voellmy-fluid flow law advanced bv Russian researchers in which the Coulomb-like drv friction is limited bv a yield stress, a~d (3) a modified Criminale-Ericksen-Filby fluid m~del proposed by No;wegian researchers. The application of the Voellmy-fluid law with active/passive straining to solve practical avalanche-dynamics problems is evaluated by applying the model to simulate laboratory experiments and field case-studies. The model is additionally evaluated by comparing simulation results using the Russian and Norwegian models. In a final analysis the influence of the initial conditions on avalanche runout is investigated. vVeconclude that the model resolves many of the shortcomings of the Voellmy-Salm model, which is traditionally used in Switzerland to predict avalanche runout. Furthermore, sinee the model contains the three well-calibrated parameters of the Swiss Guidelines on avalanche calculation it can be readily applied in practice. vVediscuss why we believe the Russian and Norwegian models are not ready for practical application. Finally, we show that many problems remain, such as the specification of the initial release conditions. vVe conclude that numerical models require a more detailed description of initial fracture conditions.
ABSTRACT. A simple quasi one-dimensional model of flowing avalanches is presented. It is a further development of that used in the Swiss Guidelines jor practitioners. It is shown that shearing in avalanche movement is concentrated near the ground and that, due to the geometrical roughness of the ground, a flow resistance proportional to the square of velocity must be taken into account in addition to dry friction. For the change of flow on changing slope angles it is demonstrated that under certain conditions for internal friction a "normal" flow on a flat lower part can no longer be attained; the avalanche behaves like a rigid body.The runout distance is in fair agreement with the Guidelines if a larger internal friction is used . The main differences lie in much smaller deposition depths and smaller velocities during runout.
The investigation of the mechanical properties of seasonal snow cover aims mostly at applications in avalanche release and avalanche control but also at no less important problems such as vehicle mobility in snow, snow removal, or construction on snow. Primary needs are (1) constitutive equations, that is, relations between the stress tensor and the motion, and (2) fracture criteria which limit the region of validity of constitutive equations. Both can be tackled from the aspect of continuum theories and structure theories. With modern continuum theories the characteristic nonlinear behavior of snow can be taken into account and also the strong dependence on stress and strain history. When thermodynamics is introduced, more insight into the deformation and fracture processes can be gained. High initial deformation rates cause low dissipation, elastic behavior, and brittle fracture, whereas when dissipative mechanisms can develop, ductile fracture occurs. The advantage of structural theories lies in the immediate physical insight into deformation mechanisms, but the disadvantage is that only simple states of stresses acting macroscopically on a snow sample can be considered. Different approaches have been elaborated: for low‐density snow the concept of chains (a series of stress‐bearing grains) or the neck growth model (consideration of stress concentrations in bonds between grains) and for high‐density snow the pore collapse model (snow idealized as a material containing air voids). Structural constitutive equations were applied to the calculation of stress waves in snow. Recorded acoustic emissions, indicating intergranular bond fractures, can also be used for the construction of constitutive equations. Structural failure theories model brittle fracture with series elements, where the weakest link causes fracture of the entire body, and ductile fracture by parallel elements, where fracture of one element leads merely to a redistribution of stresses and only after a sufficiently high increase of the load to a total failure. In this method the statistical distribution of link strength plays an important role. The mechanics of wet snow (snow containing liquid water) is considerably different from dry snow mechanics. While deformation of dry snow is dominated by (slow) creep and glide of ice grains and bonds, the densification of wet snow is mainly due to the (fast) process of pressure melting at stressed contacts of a grain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.