(1) Background: Data on coronavirus 2 infection during pregnancy vary. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 positive women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 during pregnancy and postpartum period based on data of a comprehensive German surveillance system in obstetric patients. (2) Methods: Data from COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a prospective multicenter registry for SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, was analyzed with respect to ICU treatment. All women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 were included and compared regarding maternal characteristics, course of disease, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes. (3) Results: Of 2650 cases in CRONOS, 101 women (4%) had a documented ICU stay. Median maternal age was 33 (IQR, 30–36) years. COVID-19 was diagnosed at a median gestational age of 33 (IQR, 28–35) weeks. As the most invasive form of COVID-19 treatment interventions, patients received either continuous monitoring of vital signs without further treatment requirement (n = 6), insufflation of oxygen (n = 30), non-invasive ventilation (n = 22), invasive ventilation (n = 28), or escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 15). No significant clinical differences were identified between patients receiving different forms of ventilatory support for COVID-19. Prevalence of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women receiving invasive respiratory treatments. Four women died of COVID-19 and six fetuses were stillborn. (4) Conclusions: Our cohort shows that progression of COVID-19 is rare in pregnant and postpartum women treated in the ICU. Preterm birth rate is high and COVID-19 requiring respiratory support increases the risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcome.

The current law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers largely rules out surgical activities during pregnancy for female doctors who perform surgical roles in hospitals. The proportion of female junior staff in gynaecology amounts to 80?%, and, for many of these women, surgical further training is not possible following official notification of an existing pregnancy. In a Germany-wide survey of female gynaecologists and surgeons using a questionnaire, it was determined to what extent female doctors worked in surgery during pregnancy, whether it led to complications in the pregnancy, when the employer was notified about the pregnancy, and what desire for change there is with regard to the law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers. The data from 164 female doctors, of which 136 are gynaecologists and 28 surgeons, was evaluated. On average, the pregnancy was announced during the 14th week of pregnancy (WOP), and the doctor was not allowed to perform surgical activities in the 21st WOP. Female doctors in higher professional roles tended to announce the pregnancy later and ended their surgical activities later. There was no link between the time of ceasing surgical activities and an increased occurrence of complaints or complications during the pregnancy. In total, only 53?% of respondents had an appraisal during pregnancy and 75?% wanted a change in the law on the protection of expectant and nursing mothers.

Aims To compare glycaemic control, maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with Type 1 diabetes, managed either by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, multiple daily insulin injection or switch from multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in early pregnancy. Research design and methods Data from 339 singleton pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. HbA1c values were measured preconception and in each trimester. In a secondary analysis, use of CSII pre‐pregnancy was compared with initiation of CSII during pregnancy. Results MDI was used in 140 pregnancies (41.3%) and CSII was used in 199 (58.7%), including 34 pregnancies (10.0%) during which the women switched to CSII. In pregnancies during which CSII was used duration of diabetes [median (interquartile range) 16.0 (8.0–23.0) years vs 11.0 (5.5–17.5) years; P<0.001] was longer, and the Institute of Medicine recommendations for appropriate weight gain were exceeded more often (64.8% vs. 50.8%; P=0.01). CSII use and pre‐pregnancy BMI were independent predictors of excess weight gain. There was no difference in glucose control, but CSII was associated with higher birth weight [median (interquartile range) 3720 (3365–4100) g vs 3360 (3365–4100) g; P<0.001] and higher large‐for‐gestational‐age (LGA) rate (44.7% vs. 33.6%; P=0.04) than MDI. HbA1c concentration in the third trimester and excess weight gain were predictive of LGA infants [odds ratio 2.33 (95% CI 1.54–3.51); P<0.001 and 1.89 (95% CI 1.02–3.51); P=0.04]. In pregnancies where CSII therapy was initiated in the first trimester and in those with pre‐pregnancy use, similar glucose control and outcome was achieved. Conclusions There was no advantage of CSII with respect to glycaemic control and neonatal outcomes. The rate of LGA neonates was higher in the CSII group, possibly mediated by excess maternal weight gain, which was more frequent than in women treated with MDI.

No abstract

This study provides strong evidence that health disparities for obstetric and perinatal health outcomes do not exist in immigrants relative to native Germans, but exist instead in women without post-secondary-level education compared to women with such education, regardless of ethnicity or migration history.