As it becomes more accepted and indeed even desirable to discuss different types of sexuality and different kinds of family set-ups with children, it is vital to analyse how children's books and young adult novels portray these topics. In particular, it is worth looking at how bisexuality is depicted in literature for younger readers 2 . These texts may be read to or by children in primary and secondary schools, and they may even be read by students in tertiary education. In this paper, then, I will briefly discuss the history of children's literature with regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other queer characters (LGBT) 3 , and I will then proceed to explore bisexuality in more depth. What this analysis suggests is that bisexuality is not much recognised or accepted, and if literature is relied on in educational settings as a way of teaching young people about a given topic, then children are not learning about bisexuality. If bisexuality is mentioned, it tends to be portrayed as less of an option than other types of sexuality. In short, bisexuality is either invisible or else negatively portrayed in books for younger readers. Epstein, 2013:8-15 for more on that), but it is worth pointing out that I consider children's books in a broad sense to be anything read by people 18 and younger. That is why I explore both picture books and young adult works here.3 By "otherwise queer", I refer to those who choose the queer label to represent their sexuality. This includes, among others, people involved in BDSM, intersex people, those who are questioning their sexuality, asexuals, and pansexuals, but only if they choose the queer label themselves. I have not yet found, say, a young adult novel with an asexual protagonist, or a book for children where the parents are in a master-slave relationship. This is not the place to discuss whether such topics are appropriate or not for children, but I simply wish to point out that these people exist in reality but not yet in the realm of children's books, and my personal view is that children have a right to be exposed to the world around them, in all its permutations. However, I am aware that not everyone is comfortable with the term "queer", especially in relation to children. In this paper, then, I will use LGBT for short, and I will leave aside "queer" elements for the present discussion. This does not mean that I am ignoring, for example, intersexual or asexual people.2