Background and Purpose
Because robotic devices record the kinematics and kinetics of human
movements with high resolution, we hypothesized that robotic measures
collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant
relationship to standard clinical outcome measures and, therefore, might
provide superior biomarkers.
Methods
In patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, we used
clinical scales and robotic devices to measure arm movement 7, 14, 21, 30,
and 90 days after the event at 2 clinical sites. The robots are interactive
devices that measure speed, position, and force so that calculated kinematic
and kinetic parameters could be compared with clinical assessments.
Results
Among 208 patients, robotic measures predicted well the clinical
measures (cross-validated R2 of modified Rankin
scale=0.60; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale=0.63;
Fugl-Meyer=0.73; Motor Power=0.75). When suitably scaled and combined by an
artificial neural network, the robotic measures demonstrated greater
sensitivity in measuring the recovery of patients from day 7 to day 90
(increased standardized effect=1.47).
Conclusions
These results demonstrate that robotic measures of motor performance
will more than adequately capture outcome, and the altered effect size will
reduce the required sample size. Reducing sample size will likely improve
study efficiency.
This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility and potential for improvements in upper limb motor function by using digital gaming in the chronic stroke patient population. The positive correlation found between therapy enjoyment and clinical gains highlights the importance of engagement in therapy to optimize outcomes in chronic stroke survivors.
We are investigating the neural correlates of motor recovery promoted by robot-mediated therapy in chronic stroke. This pilot study asked whether efficacy of robot-aided motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke could be predicted by a change in functional connectivity within the sensorimotor network in response to a bout of motor rehabilitation. To address this question, two stroke patients participated in a functional connectivity MRI study pre and post a 12-week robot-aided motor rehabilitation program. Functional connectivity was evaluated during three consecutive scans before the rehabilitation program: resting-state; point-to-point reaching movements executed by the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a newly developed MRI-compatible sensorized passive manipulandum; resting-state. A single resting-state scan was conducted after the rehabilitation program. Before the program, UE movement reduced functional connectivity between the ipsilesional and contralesional primary motor cortex. Reduced interhemispheric functional connectivity persisted during the second resting-state scan relative to the first and during the resting-state scan after the rehabilitation program. Greater reduction in interhemispheric functional connectivity during the resting-state was associated with greater gains in UE motor function induced by the 12-week robotic therapy program. These findings suggest that greater reduction in interhemispheric functional connectivity in response to a bout of motor rehabilitation may predict greater efficacy of the full rehabilitation program.
Objective
One of the greatest challenges in clinical trial design is dealing with the subjectivity and variability introduced by human raters when measuring clinical end-points. We hypothesized that robotic measures that capture the kinematics of human movements collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant relationship to the ordinal clinical scales and potentially lead to the development of more sensitive motor biomarkers that could improve the efficiency and cost of clinical trials.
Materials and methods
We used clinical scales and a robotic assay to measure arm movement in 208 patients 7, 14, 21, 30 and 90 days after acute ischemic stroke at two separate clinical sites. The robots are low impedance and low friction interactive devices that precisely measure speed, position and force, so that even a hemiparetic patient can generate a complete measurement profile. These profiles were used to develop predictive models of the clinical assessments employing a combination of artificial ant colonies and neural network ensembles.
Results
The resulting models replicated commonly used clinical scales to a cross-validated R2 of 0.73, 0.75, 0.63 and 0.60 for the Fugl-Meyer, Motor Power, NIH stroke and modified Rankin scales, respectively. Moreover, when suitably scaled and combined, the robotic measures demonstrated a significant increase in effect size from day 7 to 90 over historical data (1.47 versus 0.67).
Discussion and conclusion
These results suggest that it is possible to derive surrogate biomarkers that can significantly reduce the sample size required to power future stroke clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.