No abstract

Although transistor density continues to increase, voltage scaling has stalled and thus power density is increasing each technology generation. Particularly in mobile devices, which have limited cooling options, these trends lead to a utilization wall in which sustained chip performance is limited primarily by power rather than area. However, many mobile applications do not demand sustained performance; rather they comprise short bursts of computation in response to sporadic user activity.To improve responsiveness for such applications, this paper explores activating otherwise powered-down cores for sub-second bursts of intense parallel computation. The approach exploits the concept of computational sprinting, in which a chip temporarily exceeds its sustainable thermal power budget to provide instantaneous throughput, after which the chip must return to nominal operation to cool down. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, we analyze the thermal and electrical characteristics of a smart-phone-like system that nominally operates a single core (∼1W peak), but can sprint with up to 16 cores for hundreds of milliseconds. We describe a thermal design that incorporates phase-change materials to provide thermal capacitance to enable such sprints. We analyze image recognition kernels to show that parallel sprinting has the potential to achieve the task response time of a 16W chip within the thermal constraints of a 1W mobile platform.

No abstract

CMOS scaling trends have led to an inflection point where thermal constraints (especially in mobile devices that employ only passive cooling) preclude sustained operation of all transistors on a chipa phenomenon called "dark silicon." Recent research proposed computational sprinting-exceeding sustainable thermal limits for short intervals-to improve responsiveness in light of the bursty computation demands of many media-rich interactive mobile applications. Computational sprinting improves responsiveness by activating reserve cores (parallel sprinting) and/or boosting frequency/voltage (frequency sprinting) to power levels that far exceed the system's sustainable cooling capabilities, relying on thermal capacitance to buffer heat.Prior work analyzed the feasibility of sprinting through modeling and simulation. In this work, we investigate sprinting using a hardware/software testbed. First, we study unabridged sprints, wherein the computation completes before temperature becomes critical, demonstrating a 6.3× responsiveness gain, and a 6% energy efficiency improvement by racing to idle. We then analyze truncated sprints, wherein our software runtime system must intervene to prevent overheating by throttling parallelism and frequency before the computation is complete. To avoid oversubscription penalties (context switching inefficiencies after a truncated parallel sprint), we develop a sprint-aware task-based parallel runtime. We find that maximal-intensity sprinting is not always best, introduce the concept of sprint pacing, and evaluate an adaptive policy for selecting sprint intensity. We report initial results using a phase change heat sink to extend maximum sprint duration. Finally, we demonstrate that a sprint-and-rest operating regime can actually outperform thermally-limited sustained execution.

Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports Token tenure: PATCHing token counting using directory-based cache coherence Raghavan, A.; Blundell, C.; Martin, M.M.K. Copyright 2008 IEEE. Reprinted from MICRO-41. 41st IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, 8-12 Nov. 2008 ,pages 47-58. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubs-permissions@ieee.org. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it. Traditional coherence protocols present a set of difficult tradeoffs: the reliance of snoopy protocols on broadcast and ordered interconnects limits their scalability, while directory protocols incur a performance penalty on sharing misses due to indirection. This work introduces PATCH (Predictive/Adaptive Token Counting Hybrid), a coherence protocol that provides the scalability of directory protocols while opportunistically sending direct requests to reduce sharing latency. PATCH extends a standard directory protocol to track tokens and use token counting rules for enforcing coherence permissions. Token counting allows PATCH to support direct requests on an unordered interconnect, while a mechanism called token tenure uses local processor timeouts and the directorypsilas per-block point of ordering at the home node to guarantee forward progress without relying on broadcast. PATCH makes three main contributions. First, PATCH introduces token tenure, which provides broadcast-free forward progress for token counting protocols. Second, PATCH deprioritizes best-effort direct requests to match or exceed the performance of directory protocols without restricting scalability. Finally, PATCH provides greater scalability than directory protocols when using inexact encodings of sharers because only processors holding tokens need to acknowledge requests. Overall, PATCH is a ldquoone-size-fits-allrdquo coherence protocol that dynamically adapts to work well for small systems, large systems, and anywhere in between. CommentsToken tenure: PATCHing token counting using directory-based cache coherence Raghavan, A.; Blundell, C. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubs-permissions@ieee.org. By choosing to view this d...