Basic understanding of nuclear science enhances our daily-life experience in many areas, such as the environment, medicine, electric power generation, and even politics. Yet typical school curricula do not provide for experiments that explore the topic. We present a means by which educators can use the ubiquitous webcam and inexpensive sources of radiation to lead their students in a quantitative exploration of radioactivity, radiation, and the applications of nuclear physics.
We report on innovative approaches to integrating student feedback into teaching engineering physics courses. Project-based learning, presentations, and peer-feedback contributed to an enhanced class experience. This interactive method was applied in Optics and Engineering Measurements courses. The Optics course was mainly focused on geometrical optics with a survey of wave optics. In order to compensate for the lack of laboratory work, an optics project was introduced alongside class demos. Students browsed for possible topics for a couple of weeks and then proposed one based on instructor's feedback. The project concluded with a short presentation of the work in front of the class and a brief written report. In order to increase class interest in the project, the presentation took the form of a competition and the winner(s) were chosen by the class, who judged the presentations according to preset criteria. Student feedback was recorded and quantized, and the peer evaluation and feedback were returned to the presenters. The winners received small prizes in recognition of their performance. Interesting project ideas were formulated and some were implemented, although not always with the expected outcomes. Students enjoyed the peer feedback system, which exposed them to a different perspective on and evaluation of their work. For the Engineering Measurements course, students did small group projects on topics of common interest to group members. Group oral presentations and individual written reports replaced the traditional final exam. Subjects included topics such as magnetooptics, urban astronomy, acoustics, electro-mechanics, solar power, stress-strain measurements, laser beam divergence, and Brewster angle for different materials. Faculty attended presentations and participated with the students in the evaluation of the presentations using evaluation sheets provided in advance. Students preferred this type of examination to the stress of the final exam, despite devoting at least as much time and effort to their project and presentation as they would to traditional final exam preparation. Peer and faculty feedback during the term was particularly effective in enhanced collaboration, negotiations, and task prioritizing for successful project completions. In both teaching approaches, the project presentations involving peer feedback and student competition created an effervescent atmosphere and debates, and maintained student interest and participation. In a collaborative yet competitive environment, students learned to use laboratory equipment as well as their own resources. We report on the enhanced class experience, successes, and shortcomings of the project-based peerevaluation method used in the classroom. The effectiveness shown in the Optics and Measurements classes indicates that this teaching approach is more generally applicable to other project-based courses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.