Background: The objective was to analyze clinical, microbiological, and immunological periodontal parameters in patients in corrective orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods: Twenty-eight patients were selected. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), width of keratinized gingiva, levels of 40 bacterial species, and of 3 cytokines (IL-1β, MMP-8, and TNF-α) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were evaluated at T0, before orthodontic treatment; T1, 6 months; and T2, 12 months posttreatment. Non-parametric, Friedman, Wilcoxon, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation coefficient tests were used for statistical analyses, with the significance level of 5%. Results: No significant difference was found for the width of keratinized gingiva, but PI presented a significant increase at T1 and T2 (p < 0.05) when compared with T0. The percentage of sites with BOP increased significantly from T0 to T1 (p < 0.05); however, at T2, the values decreased and did not differ anymore from T0 (p > 0.05). In the microbiological analysis, red complex pathogens were in significantly greater proportions in T2 compared with T0 (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the cytokine levels between the periods but there was a positive correlation between BOP and IL-1β (r = 0.49 p = .01) and TNF-α (r = 0.39 and p = .05). Conclusion: In conclusion, corrective orthodontic treatment caused clinical periodontal alterations regarding biofilm accumulation and gingival bleeding, with alteration of periodontopathogens.

No abstract

Background: New bone formation and tissue remodeling are the major challenges in implantology today. Titanium meshes have demonstrated reconstructive potential for vertical bone gain. However, the soft tissue healing is technically sensitive to the surgical procedure. The combined usage of collagen membrane and specification of the meshes may ensure greater predictability. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the influence of collagen membrane on the quality of the new bone formation in guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures with different titanium meshes. Methods: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were randomly allocated into four main experimental groups, according to mesh pore size in m: Group P300 (titanium meshes, with 0.3-mm thickness and 3-mm pore size; n = 7); Group P175 (titanium meshes, with 0.3-mm thickness and 1.75-mm pore size; n = 7); Group P85: (titanium meshes, with 0.04-mm thickness and 0.85-mm pore size; n = 7); Group P15: (titanium meshes. with 0.04-mm thickness and 0.15-mm pore size; n = 7). The femurs of each animal were subdivided into test and control groups: Test: bovine bone graft associated with porcine collagen and collagen membrane was used; control: bovine bone graft associated with porcine collagen was used without association with collagen membrane. Bone quality evaluation by in vivo microtomography and histologic analysis were performed. Results: Bone volume formation was similar between groups (P >0.05). However, the titanium meshes with pore size >1 mm demonstrated higher mineral bone density in comparison with meshes with pore size <1 mm (P <0.05), regardless of the combined usage of collagen membrane. All groups showed a spongy bone formation after 30 days. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

No abstract

This article addresses diagnostic parameters that should be assessed in the treatment of extraction sockets with dental implant placement by presenting three case reports that emphasize the relevance of the amount of remaining bone walls. Diagnosis was based on the analysis of clinical and radiographic parameters (e.g.: bone defect morphology, remaining bone volume, presence of infections on the receptor site). Case 1 presents a 5-wall defect in the maxillary right central incisor region with severe root resorption, which was treated with immediate implant placement. Cases 2 and 3 present, respectively, two- and three-wall bone defects that did not have indication for immediate implants. These cases were first submitted to a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure with bone graft biomaterial and membrane barriers, and the implants were installed in a second surgical procedure. The analysis of the preoperative periodontal condition of the adjacent teeth and bone defect morphology is extremely important because these factors determine the choice between immediate implant or GBR treatment followed by implant installation in a subsequent intervention.

Gingival inflammation is clinically characterized by gingival redness, swelling and increased tendency of bleeding of the soft tissue. Bacterial biofilm is the etiological agent. If, at this stage, the bacterial biofilm is removed and appropriate control methods are applied, remission of gingival inflammation occurs. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a single session of ultrasonic prophylaxis for the reduction of gingivitis in an adolescent population using the Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI). The study sample consisted of 15 male adolescent students selected at a dentist's office of a public high school. Prior to treatment (baseline), plaque index (PI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded. The patients then received oral hygiene instructions and ultrasonic prophylaxis. Follow-up exams were made 15 and 30 days after the ultrasonic prophylaxis, again recording PI and BOP. The data were analyzed by the Student's t-test for dependent samples. Correlation analysis between presence of biofilm and bleeding on probing was also made using the Pearson correlation test. There was a statistically significant decrease in the plaque index and bleeding on probing between baseline and examinations at both 15 days and 30 days (p<0.05). However, the difference between the means at 15 and 30 days was statistically similar. The correlation analysis showed correlation between both parameters (p<0.05). The results indicate that a single session of ultrasonic prophylaxis associated to oral hygiene instructions is efficient to reverse gingivitis in adolescents.

No abstract

Aggressive periodontitis, a distinct clinical entity of periodontal disease, is characterized by a pronounced episodic and rapid destruction of periodontal tissues and may result in rapid and RESUMOA periodontite agressiva, uma entidade clínica distinta da doença periodontal, é caracterizada por uma pronunciada destruição episódica e rápida dos tecidos periodontais e pode resultar em perda rápida e precoce dos dentes. Alguns trabalhos têm mostrado que o debridamento mecânico convencional juntamente com higiene oral muitas vezes não é suficiente para o controle da doença. Apesar de não existir consenso, estudos recentes desta condição mostram efeitos benéficos de terapias auxiliares ou coadjuvantes como a administração de antimicrobianos sistêmicos e locais. Entre os coadjuvantes locais, a literatura apresenta os antissépticos, antibióticos e terapia fotodinâmica. Dentre os sistêmicos são representados os antibióticos e antiinflamatórios. Independentemente dos resultados apresentados por cada um deles, se reconhece a dificuldade em se estabelecer um protocolo único para todos os casos em função da resposta individual apresentada por cada paciente. O objetivo do presente estudo foi revisar os resultados atuais sobre administração de coadjuvantes químicos associados à terapia convencional em casos de periodontite agressiva e sugerir protocolos clínicos.Termos de indexação: Periodontite agressiva. Antibacterianos. Anti-infecciosos locais. Antissépticos bucais. Anti-inflamatórios. Fotoquimioterapia. and alveolar bone destruction and c) family concentration of cases. The diagnosis of AP requires the exclusion of systemic diseases that may harm the host defense and lead to premature teeth loss (periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases). Auxiliary chemical therapies in the treatment of aggressive periodontitis: current aspectsThe existence of particular forms of AP was also recognized based on specific clinical and lab characteristics: localized aggressive periodontitis (LAP) and generalized aggresssive periodontitis (GAP) 2 .A successful treatment of AP is dependent of early diagnosis, directing the therapy to the elimination or deletion of pathogens, providing a favorable