No abstract

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. Purpose: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. Results: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Conclusion: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. Registration: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO)

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the optimal timing of ACL reconstruction and the influence of this timing on chondral damage remain unclear. Purpose: To assess the effect of timing of ACL reconstruction on the presence of chondral injuries via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Two reviewers independently performed systematic literature searches of 5 online databases using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria were any comparative study of patients aged >16 years that assessed the relationship between timing of primary ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of chondral injuries. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results: After screening, 14 studies (n = 3559 patients) out of 2363 titles met the inclusion criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials (n = 272), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 398), and 8 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2889). In analysis of the studies, chondral injury rates were compared between ACL reconstructions performed before and after 3 time points: 3, 6, and 12 months after injury (eg, ≤3 vs >3 months). The rates of chondral injury increased with each time point. The increase was mostly due to low-grade injuries at 3 months (estimated odds ratio, 1.914; 95% CI, 1.242-2.949; P = .003), with the increase in high-grade injuries becoming predominant after 12 months (estimated odds ratio, 3.057; 95% CI, 1.460-6.40; P = .003). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that delaying ACL reconstruction surgery results in a higher rate of chondral injuries and the severity of these lesions worsens with time. These findings are comparable with those of our previously published study, which demonstrated a higher risk of meniscal tears associated with delayed ACL surgery. When ACL reconstruction is indicated, surgery ≤3 months after injury is associated with a lower risk of intra-articular damage. Registration: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

Little is known about the impact of peer support programmes on physical health populations or on the methods used to evaluate such programmes. The present study undertakes a scoping review of research related to peer support programmes or interventions in physical health populations, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search was carried out across the Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases and focused on papers that evaluated peer support intervention(s) in adults with physical health conditions. The search identified an initial 7,903 records, which were narrowed down to 21 records that met the inclusion criteria; their findings were narratively synthesized. The scoping review found considerable heterogeneity among eligible records in terms of their study design, outcome measurements and findings reported. Qualitative methods of evaluation generated more consistent findings compared to objective outcome measures and suggested that peer support was beneficial for patients’ health and wellbeing by reducing feelings of isolation and creating a sense of community as well as providing an opportunity for information consolidation. The scoping review highlights the inconsistencies in methods used to evaluate peer support interventions and programmes in healthcare settings among different physical health populations. It also draws attention to the lack of peer support research in particular areas, including in acute physical health populations such as in major trauma. The scoping review emphasizes the need for future studies to address this gap in peer support research.

Purpose To compare the CFR-PEEK plates with conventional plates in fracture fixation with regards to clinical and radiological outcomes and complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in four online databases independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. The identified relevant studies were assessed against predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality was carried out. Results Nine studies (patient n = 361) out of 6594 records were included for analysis: 2 RCTs (n = 63), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 151), and 4 retrospective cohort studies (n = 147). Studies were grouped per anatomic area of fixation. Four studies (n = 200) examined fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Two studies (n = 74) examined fixation of distal radius fractures. Two studies (n = 53) assessed outcomes of fixation of distal femur fractures. One study (n = 87) assessed the outcomes of fixation of ankle fractures. All nine studies reported very high union rates (from 91% in distal femur to 100% in upper limb) for the CFR-PEEK plate groups and low complication rates. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, and rate of complications as compared to the conventional plate groups. Conclusion CFR-PEEK plates have high union rates in extremity fracture fixation similar to conventional plates with comparable good clinical outcomes and a very low and comparable rate of complications. Considering their advantages, CFR-PEEK plates seem to be valid alternative to conventional plating.

No abstract