Little is known about the impact of peer support programmes on physical health populations or on the methods used to evaluate such programmes. The present study undertakes a scoping review of research related to peer support programmes or interventions in physical health populations, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The search was carried out across the Medline, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases and focused on papers that evaluated peer support intervention(s) in adults with physical health conditions. The search identified an initial 7,903 records, which were narrowed down to 21 records that met the inclusion criteria; their findings were narratively synthesized. The scoping review found considerable heterogeneity among eligible records in terms of their study design, outcome measurements and findings reported. Qualitative methods of evaluation generated more consistent findings compared to objective outcome measures and suggested that peer support was beneficial for patients’ health and wellbeing by reducing feelings of isolation and creating a sense of community as well as providing an opportunity for information consolidation. The scoping review highlights the inconsistencies in methods used to evaluate peer support interventions and programmes in healthcare settings among different physical health populations. It also draws attention to the lack of peer support research in particular areas, including in acute physical health populations such as in major trauma. The scoping review emphasizes the need for future studies to address this gap in peer support research.
During the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, supporting the emotional wellbeing of healthcare staff is essential to help prevent burnout and promote self-care, given the emotional demands and increased workload. An overview of the development of a staff support service in a large teaching hospital is provided. The Leeds Clinical and Health Psychology department set up a face to face, drop-in service, and telephone support service for all staff. A comprehensive evaluation database and attendance log was developed. This ensured that data were recorded from each staff support session. A short anonymous electronic survey was sent to staff who had accessed the service. Over an 18-week period, a total of 458 sessions were offered to support staff; 318 were face to face, 134 were telephone sessions, and six were email enquiries. Three hundred and ninety-four unique individuals accessed the service over this period. In response to the data collected, adjustments were made to when the service was available. Work-related stress was the most consistent reason for staff accessing support. Of the 458 staff contacts, 243 contacts specifically named COVID-19 related issues. Psychological first aid and coping strategy development were the most widely used interventions offered. The data collected highlights the benefit of offering a staff support service during COVID-19, and the benefit of evaluating a service, ensuring that the service is responsive to staff need. Public Significance StatementThis paper provides an evaluation of a new staff support service set up at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in a large teaching hospital in England. Data were collected over an 18-week period, providing information about the reasons for staff accessing support and the type of support offered. Feedback was also collected from staff members who accessed the service. The data collected highlighted the importance of offering emotional support to staff and informed future service planning for ongoing staff support.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.