During project execution, deviations from the baseline schedule are inevitable due to the presence of uncertainty and variability. To assure successful project completion, the project's progress should be monitored and corrective actions should be taken to get the project back on track. This paper presents an integrated project control procedure for measuring the project's progress and taking corrective actions when necessary. We apply corrective actions that reduce the activity variability to improve the project outcome. Therefore, we quantify the relation between the applied managerial effort and the reduction in activity variability. Moreover, we define three distinct control strategies to take corrective actions on activities, i.e. an interventive strategy, a preventive strategy and a hybrid strategy. A computational experiment is conducted to evaluate the performance of these strategies. The results of this experiment show that different strategies are preferred depending on the topological network structure of projects. More specifically, the interventive strategy and hybrid strategy are preferred for parallel projects, while the preventive strategy is preferred for serial projects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.