2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A buffer control method for top-down project control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unspecific to mining, construction scheduling research has been thoroughly explored in the past, with main focuses including duration uncertainty and scheduling under unpredictable circumstances (Zhou, Love, Wang, Teo, & Irani, 2013). Martens and Vanhoucke (2017) proposed a different approach to project management in the construction industry based on reacting and correcting unexpected events throughout the project management. Other studies have employed a variety of optimization models to construction scheduling problems such as simulated annealing (Azaron, Sakawa, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, & Safaei, 2007, König & Beißert, 2009, ant colony optimization (Xiong & Kuang, 2008), particle swarm optimization (Guo, Zhu, Ding, & Li, 2010), neural networks (Adeli & Karim, 1997), and genetic algorithms (Guo, Zhu, Ding, & Li, 2010;Eldin & Senouci, 2004;and Calp & Akcayol, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unspecific to mining, construction scheduling research has been thoroughly explored in the past, with main focuses including duration uncertainty and scheduling under unpredictable circumstances (Zhou, Love, Wang, Teo, & Irani, 2013). Martens and Vanhoucke (2017) proposed a different approach to project management in the construction industry based on reacting and correcting unexpected events throughout the project management. Other studies have employed a variety of optimization models to construction scheduling problems such as simulated annealing (Azaron, Sakawa, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, & Safaei, 2007, König & Beißert, 2009, ant colony optimization (Xiong & Kuang, 2008), particle swarm optimization (Guo, Zhu, Ding, & Li, 2010), neural networks (Adeli & Karim, 1997), and genetic algorithms (Guo, Zhu, Ding, & Li, 2010;Eldin & Senouci, 2004;and Calp & Akcayol, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five important prerequisites have been identified for implementing CCPM: unity of purpose, fixed throughput, urgency, sequential workflow and a non-dedicated team. Martens and Vanhoucke (2007) offered a buffer control method for top-down project control. The buffer size and buffer protection methods that have been proposed to date have been stochastic in nature, since these studies have tried to model the disruptions caused by uncertainty-laden critical chains.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before in literature, authors in [3] and [12] applied buffer management concept in EVM method to produce a new tolerance limits for SPI (t) and SV (t) metrics. In this section, we applied EVM concepts to construct an improved buffer monitoring system.…”
Section: Integration Of Buffer Monitoring System and Earned Value Manmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] the application of buffer concept from critical chain management in earned value management/ earned schedule (EVM/ES) is illustrated and linearly tolerance limits were proposed for the EVM/ES schedule performance metrics SPI (t) and SV (t). In the other research, authors set tolerance limits for EVM/ES schedule performance metrics EVM/ES by allocating project buffer over the different project phases and new metrics have been developed [12].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation