BACKGROUND:
Initial reports on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in children suggested that very young age and comorbidities may increase risk of severe evolution, but these findings remained to be confirmed. We aimed to analyze the clinical spectrum of hospitalized pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and predictors of severe disease evolution.
METHODS:
We conducted a French national prospective surveillance of children hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We included all children with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in 60 hospitals during February 15 to June 1, 2020. The main outcome was the proportion of children with severe disease, defined by hemodynamic or ventilatory (invasive or not) support requirement.
RESULTS:
We included 397 hospitalized children with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We identified several clinical patterns, ranging from paucisymptomatic children, admitted for surveillance, to lower respiratory tract infection or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Children <90 days old accounted for 37% of cases (145 of 397), but only 4 (3%) had severe disease. Excluding children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (n = 29) and hospitalized for a diagnosis not related to SARS-CoV-2 (n = 62), 23 of 306 (11%) children had severe disease, including 6 deaths. Factors independently associated with severity were age ≥10 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1–10.3), hypoxemia (OR = 8.9 [2.6–29.7]), C-reactive protein level ≥80 mg/L (OR = 6.6 [1.4–27.5]).
CONCLUSIONS:
In contrast with preliminary reports, young age was not an independent factor associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, and children <90 days old were at the lowest risk of severe disease evolution. This may help physicians to better identify risk of severe disease progression in children.
recently reported a favorable outcome of an acute chest syndrome (ACS) related to a SARS-Cov-2 infection treated with tocilizumab (TCZ), in a 45-year-old male patient with homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD). Following this successful observation, TCZ was administered to a teenage girl with SCD who developed a severe COVID-19 associating ACS and pulmonary embolism. This 16-year-old girl has a severe form of homozygous SCD with bilateral ischemic retinopathy. Given the recurrence of vaso-occlusive crises and abnormal transcranial doppler evaluations, she was treated with exchange transfusions from 5 to 11 years old, switched thereafter for hydroxyurea (22 mg/kg/day), with a favorable clinical outcome on vaso-occlusive events. She had no history of ACS or pulmonary hyper-
Background The extent to which very young children contribute to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is unclear. We aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in daycare centres that remained open for key workers' children during a nationwide lockdown in France. Methods Children and staff who attended one of 22 daycare centres during a nationwide lockdown in France (between March 15 and May 9, 2020) were included in this cross-sectional, multicentre, seroprevalence study. Hospital staff not occupationally exposed to patients with COVID-19, or to children, were enrolled in a comparator group. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in children, daycare centre staff, and the comparator group. The presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in capillary whole blood was measured with a rapid chromatographic immunoassay. We computed raw prevalence as the percentage of individuals with a positive IgG or IgM test, and used Bayesian smoothing to account for imperfect sensitivity and specificity of the assay. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04413968. Findings Between June 4 and July 3, 2020, we enrolled 327 children (mean age 1•9 [SD 0•9] years; range 5 months to 4•4 years), 197 daycare centre staff (mean age 40 [12] years), and 164 adults in the comparator group (42 [12] years). Positive serological tests were observed for 14 children (raw seroprevalence 4•3%; 95% CI 2•6-7•1) and 14 daycare centre staff (7•7%; 4•2-11•6). After accounting for imperfect sensitivity and specificity of the assay, we estimated that 3•7% (95% credible interval [95% CrI] 1•3-6•8) of the children and 6•8% (3•2-11•5) of daycare centre staff had SARS-CoV-2 infection. The comparator group fared similarly to the daycare centre staff; nine participants had a positive serological test (raw seroprevalence 5•5%; 95% CI 2•9-10•1), leading to a seroprevalence of 5•0% (95% CrI 1•6-9•8) after accounting for assay characteristics. An exploratory analysis suggested that seropositive children were more likely than seronegative children to have been exposed to an adult household member with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 (six [43%] of 14 vs 19 [6%] of 307; relative risk 7•1 [95% CI 2•2-22•4]). Interpretation According to serological test results, the proportion of young children in our sample with SARS-CoV-2 infection was low. Intrafamily transmission seemed more plausible than transmission within daycare centres. Further epidemiological studies are needed to confirm this exploratory hypothesis.
In the era of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis, we found decreased incidence of early-onset GBS meningitis but, unexpectedly, increased incidence of LOD. These data underline the interest in the development of effective GBS vaccines for pregnant women.
Aim
This study determined the influence of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the occurrence of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS‐C) and compared the main characteristics of MIS‐C and Kawasaki disease (KD).
Methods
We included patients aged up to 18 years of age who were diagnosed with MIS‐C or KD in a paediatric university hospital in Paris from 1 January 2018 to 15 July 2020. Clinical, laboratory and imaging characteristics were compared, and new French COVID‐19 cases were correlated with MIS‐C cases in our hospital.
Results
There were seven children with MIS‐C, from 6 months to 12 years of age, who were all positive for the virus that causes COVID‐19, and 40 virus‐negative children with KD. Their respective characteristics were as follows: under 5 years of age (14.3% vs. 85.0%), paediatric intensive care unit admission (100% vs. 10.0%), abdominal pain (71.4% vs. 12.5%), myocardial dysfunction (85.7% vs. 5.0%), shock syndrome (85.7% vs. 2.5%) and mean and standard deviation C‐reactive protein (339 ± 131 vs. 153 ± 87). There was a strong lagged correlation between the rise and fall in MIS‐C patients and COVID‐19 cases.
Conclusion
The rise and fall of COVID‐19 first wave mirrored the MIS‐C cases. There were important differences between MIS‐C and KD.
From March 2, 2020, to April 26, 2020, 52,588 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were performed in France, 6490 in children and 46,098 in adults. The rate of RT-PCR–positive SARS-CoV-2 tests for children (5.9%) was always less than that for adults (20.3%) but vary according to the epidemic stage. The risk ratio of RT-PCR–positive SARS-CoV-2 tests for adults compared with children was 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 3.2–3.9) for the whole study period.
Aim To describe the trends of RT-PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 rates in children and adults according to the time of COVID-19 epidemic.
Methods In this prospective multicenter study involving 45 pediatric units, we collected the results of nasopharyngeal swabs in France from March 2, 2020 to April 26, 2020.
Results During the study period, 52,588 RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were performed, 6,490 in children and 46,098 in adults. The risk ratio of RT-PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 tests for adults compared to children was 3.5 (95% CI [3.2;3.9]) for the whole study period. These rates varied according to the time of the epidemic and were higher at the peak. The lower rates of positive test in children persisted during the surveillance period but varied according to the time in the epidemic.
Conclusion The rate of positive RT-PCR positive SARS-CoV-2 tests for children was always less than that for adults but vary according to the epidemic stage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.