The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and the complications of intra-articular temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injections in 40 patients with osteoarthritis of the TMJ. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups, and the patients received either two intra-articular injections with sodium hyaluronate or two intra-articular injections with corticosteroids, 14 days apart. The effect of the treatment was evaluated 14 days, 1 and 6 months after the initial injection and was based on the following measurements: pain intensity, pain localization, joint sounds, mandibular function and complications. Both groups of patients had less pain intensity at the 6-month follow-up, and there was significantly less pain intensity in the group of patients receiving sodium hyaluronate compared with corticosteroids (P = 0.001). A decrease in crepitation was seen in both groups. In the 20 subjects receiving sodium hyaluronate both the mandibular vertical opening and protrusion increased significantly (P < 0.000). Lateral movement from the affected side increased both in subjects injected with sodium hyaluronate (P = 0.024), and those injected with corticosteroids (P = 0.042). In conclusion, this study confirms that injections in the TMJ with sodium hyaluronate or corticosteroids may reduce pain and improve function in patients with osteoarthritis. The injections were more effective in patients with only TMJ pain compared with patients suffering from both TMJ and myofascial pain. Injection with sodium hyaluronate was significantly more effective in decreasing pain intensity than corticosteroids. Temporary pain after injections may be observed.

Not all of the predicted advantages with digital compared to film-based radiography hold true in daily clinical work. Of particular interest is the relationship between number of images, retakes and the dose given to the patient.

No abstract

Enhancement of storage phosphor images improved detection of approximal caries in this in vitro study compared with unenhanced images and Ektaspeed film.

The Norwegian CBCT clinics surveyed were fully digitized and had multiple dentists. Periodontists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons were the most frequent specialties represented in the clinics. Clinics with only dental specialists performed more CBCT examinations/week than clinics with general practitioners or both general practitioners and specialists. The most common indications for CBCT examinations were related to treatment planning. This study found some challenges related to image quality and communication within the radiological team.

This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of intra-articular temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis for patients with osteoarthritis and compared arthrocentesis/lavage alone with arthrocentesis/lavage and injected hyaluronic acid. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, and 37 completed long-term follow-up (approximately 4 years). The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: arthrocentesis with lavage alone (A-group, n = 17) or combined with hyaluronic acid treatment (AS-group, n = 20). Standard two-needle arthrocentesis was performed. Pain and joint sounds were measured at baseline and approximately 4 years after treatment. Reported pain, as indicated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, significantly decreased from baseline to the final follow-up examination in both groups. Mean VAS score decreased from 64 to 16 (P < 0.001) in the A-group and from 63 to 25 (P < 0.001) in the AS-group. Average maximum incisor opening increased significantly in both groups but did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.223). Joint sounds did not significantly improve within groups (A-group, P = 0.495; AS-group, P = 0.236). Both methods resulted in significant long-term improvements in pain and jaw function.

Working in a private or group practice or using multiple computers were significant factors in choosing digital radiography.

Objectives: To study whether caries–specific enhancement of storage phosphor images might improve the observer performance of approximal caries depth assessments compared with film radiography. Materials and Methods: 120 exposures were made of 120 extracted human teeth. To obtain geometrically identical images, Ektaspeed Plus films and storage phosphor plates were exposed simultaneously. The imaging plates were scanned in a Digora^® scanner and the files transferred to a different platform for image enhancement. Nine observers viewed films and storage phosphor images without provisions for adjustment of image intensity and contrast. For each imaging modality, 240 approximal surfaces were rated for caries on a 5–point confidence scale. Definite and probable caries lesions were also rated for lesion depth, and all ratings were compared with the histological state. Diagnostic accuracy was expressed as the area under the ROC curve (A_z value). Paired t tests were used to compare the imaging modalities for diagnostic accuracy and F tests to compare observer variances. Results: Enhanced storage phosphor images demonstrated significantly higher mean A_z values than film (p = 0.0066). Significantly higher mean A_z values were demonstrated in the outer half of enamel (p = 0.01), but no significant differences were found between the modalities for caries lesions penetrating beyond the outer half of the enamel. The number of correctly diagnosed true–positive surfaces with caries in outer enamel was significantly higher with storage phosphor images than with film (p = 0.00014). False–positive surfaces were most frequently registered in the outer enamel with both modalities, but in this region the number of false–positive surfaces was significantly higher with storage phosphor images than with film (p = 0.0038). Pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.48/0.94 and 0.61/0.86 for film and storage phosphor images, respectively. The interobserver variability was significantly lower for storage phosphor images than for film. Conclusion: Enhancement of storage phosphor images with a caries–specific procedure significantly improved the accuracy of caries depth assessments in the outer half of the enamel compared with film radiography and reduced observer variability.