2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Injection of sodium hyaluronate compared to a corticosteroid in the treatment of patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: a CT evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
69
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, no comparable studies are available in the literature where a selected group of patients with non-reducing disk displacement (NDD) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has been treated with ultrasound guided TMJ PRP injection compared with the previous studies which have focused mainly on the clinical symptoms after TMJ injections and hyaluronic acid injections [15,23,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, no comparable studies are available in the literature where a selected group of patients with non-reducing disk displacement (NDD) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has been treated with ultrasound guided TMJ PRP injection compared with the previous studies which have focused mainly on the clinical symptoms after TMJ injections and hyaluronic acid injections [15,23,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of TMJ injections have focused on decreased pain after injection in patients with both pain and limited mouth opening secondary to inflammatory disorders of the joint, such as arthritis and capsulitis [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study confirms that TMJ infiltration with SH or SS may decrease pain and improve function in patients with osteoarthritis and that SH infiltrations were significantly more effective to decrease pain intensity as compared to SS. in addition, regardless of injecting SH or SS, one may emphasize that there will be no bone structure changes, as shown by other authors 37 in a study with 36 patients with bilateral TMJ osteoarthritis (level of evidence 2). Two well-designed clinical trials 35,36 show better results for intra-articular TMJ infiltration with SH as compared to corticosteroids for joint TMD signs and symptoms.…”
Section: Description Of Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Considering HA properties, viscosuplementation with HA has been used in different joint TMDs, such as reducing and nonreducing disc displacement, osteoarthritis and degenerative joint disease 16,17,20,21,23,[34][35][36][37][38] . A multicenter study 16 involved a sample of 121 participants divided in two parallel groups, who were followed up for six months.…”
Section: Description Of Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En los 11 estudios revisados y seleccionados realizados en humanos (10,11,15,16,22,23,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), se observan diversos esquemas de infiltración de AH, en cuanto a concentración, dosis, frecuencia y extensión del tratamiento. Respecto a la concentración, en 6 estudios se utilizó el AH al 1% (10,11,22,23,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), en 2 estudios se administró en concentración de 0,5% (15,30), y un estudio utilizó AH al 1,5% (16).…”
Section: Estudios En Humanosunclassified