How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey

Hol, Caroline; Hellén‐Halme, Kristina; Torgersen, Gerald; Nilsson, Mats; Møystad, Anne

doi:10.3109/00016357.2014.979866

Cited by 46 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The response rates in our study was 78.79%, close to that usually obtained in similar surveys especially 72.73% in Iran in 2015 by Mehdizadeh M. et al [6] and 74% in Norway in 2014 by Hol C. et al [7]. Our sample is small, 26 participants in all.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…In Iran, 33.7% of practitioners suggest scanner to their patients, 18.8% suggest CBCT, and 46.3% had never suggested CBCT [6].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to practitioners in Togo, trauma represents 34.62% of indications for 3D sectional imaging, 7.79% for implantology, whereas implantology alone accounted for 63.40% in Switzerland [10] and 62.5% in Iran [6]. According to directives in Switzerland in 2015, the CBCT is mainly used for implant treatment [2].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Knowledge and Practices of Dentists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and the Dentascanner in a Low Income Country: Case of Togo

Tchaou¹,

Bissa²,

Pegbessou³

et al. 2017

OJRad

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In dental-maxillofacial imaging, 3D sectional imaging progressively replaces conventional 2D imaging in developed countries. They are based specially on Computed tomography (CT-Scan), with the Dentascan application and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In developing countries those technics are newly introduced. Aim: This study aimed at studying the knowledge and practices of dentist and oral and maxillofacial surgeons on sectional imaging such as Dentascan and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: We conducted an anonymous survey among dentists and oral maxillofacial surgeons in Togo over one month. Results: The response rate was 78.79% (27/33). They were mainly male sex (sex ratio of 2.25 men for one woman). They were aged between 27 and 71 years old with an average of 49.69 years old. The majority (61.54%) had a professional experience over 20 years. The majority of respondents (65.38%) believed their level of knowledge about dental x-Ray was poor. Half of them (50%) confirmed that they had never asked for a Dentascan, and 15.38% asked from time to time for it and only two (7.69%) asked often for this test. 96.15% confirm they have no knowledge of the Dentascan. Regarding the CBCT, 84.62% didn't ask for it because this technique did not exist in Togo before. 69.20% of respondents confessed to be interested in continuing training on sectional imaging. Conclusion: This study shows that sectional imaging is very little used by oral and dental practitioners in Togo because of the ignorance of the new techniques 2 and the absence of the CBCT. It is therefore necessary to promote the teaching of the new technique of sectional imaging in the training syllabus of oral and dental specialists and to initiate continuing medical training.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…In Iran, 33.7% of practitioners suggest scanner to their patients, 18.8% suggest CBCT, and 46.3% had never suggested CBCT [6].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Knowledge and Practices of Dentists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and the Dentascanner in a Low Income Country: Case of Togo

Tchaou¹,

Bissa²,

Pegbessou³

et al. 2017

OJRad

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most frequently, CBCT was used for implant treatment planning and localization of impacted teeth; however, no prevalence, particularly, for mandibular third molars was reported. 9 Questionnaire studies are prone to be associated with various types of errors, 10 and to our knowledge, no observational, epidemiological studies have been conducted, where GPs' offices have been visited and patient files including images read systematically to obtain information on the use of radiographic methods for a specific diagnostic task in dentistry.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There seems to be only one study that has assessed how GPs use CBCT, or other radiographic methods, in private dental clinics. 9 This was a questionnaire study conducted among the registered CBCT clinics in Norway. Most frequently, CBCT was used for implant treatment planning and localization of impacted teeth; however, no prevalence, particularly, for mandibular third molars was reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics

Matzen¹,

Petersen²,

Wenzel³

2016

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess radiographic methods and diagnostically sufficient images used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics. Furthermore, to assess factors predisposing for an additional radiographic examination. Methods: 2 observers visited 18 randomly selected clinics in Denmark and studied patient files, including radiographs of patients who had their mandibular third molar(s) removed. The radiographic unit and type of receptor were registered. A diagnostically sufficient image was defined as the whole tooth and mandibular canal were displayed in the radiograph (yes/no). Overprojection between the tooth and mandibular canal (yes/no) and patient-reported inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbances (yes/no) were recorded. Regression analyses tested if overprojection between the third molar and the mandibular canal and an insufficient intraoral image predisposed for additional radiographic examination(s). Results: 1500 mandibular third molars had been removed; 1090 had intraoral, 468 had panoramic and 67 had CBCT examination. 1000 teeth were removed after an intraoral examination alone, 433 after panoramic examination and 67 after CBCT examination. 90 teeth had an additional examination after intraoral. Overprojection between the tooth and mandibular canal was a significant factor (p , 0.001, odds ratio 5 3.56) for an additional examination. 63.7% of the intraoral images were sufficient and 36.3% were insufficient, with no significant difference between images performed with phosphor plates and solid-state sensors (p 5 0.6). An insufficient image predisposed for an additional examination (p 5 0.008, odds ratio 5 1.8) but was only performed in 11% of the cases. Conclusions: Most mandibular third molars were removed based on an intraoral examination although 36.3% were insufficient. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2016Radiology ( ) 45, 20150226. doi: 10.1259 Cite this article as: Matzen LH, Petersen LB, Wenzel A. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016; 45: 20150226.

show abstract

Radiographic imaging in relation to the mandibular third molar: a survey among oral surgeons in Sweden

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To query the experience of oral surgeons concerning referral routines and preferences for radiographic imaging modality before surgical removal of mandibular third molars and investigate factors that influence imaging modality preferences. Materials and methods Members of the Swedish Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (n = 280) were invited to participate in a web-based digital survey concerning their experiences and use of three imaging modalities in pre-surgical assessment of mandibular third molar removal. The survey comprised multiple-choice questions and four cases depicted in images; respondents reported whether they would supplement the cases with other images and, if so, from which modality. Results The response rate was 64%. Panoramic radiographs were most commonly used in pre-surgical planning (response options: always or often), significant difference between professions (p = 0.039), and considered to facilitate treatment planning (87%), as was CBCT (82%); for 51%, CBCT reduced post-operative complications. Preferred modality for localizing the mandibular canal was fairly evenly distributed and for non-complex case, significant difference between subgroups of OMFS surgeons was found (p = 0.003) as to preference for intraoral radiographs. Conclusions A majority of respondents received a report within 2 weeks of their referral for CBCT and would read the report and view the images before surgery. Image modality preference differed depending on case complexity, with a greater perceived need for CBCT. Profession and practical experience affected choice. Clinical relevance Choice of imaging modality in mandibular third molar assessment is also important from dose delivery and social economy standpoints.

show abstract

How do dentists use CBCT in dental clinics? A Norwegian nationwide survey

Cited by 46 publications

References 27 publications

Knowledge and Practices of Dentists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and the Dentascanner in a Low Income Country: Case of Togo

Knowledge and Practices of Dentists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and the Dentascanner in a Low Income Country: Case of Togo

Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics

Radiographic imaging in relation to the mandibular third molar: a survey among oral surgeons in Sweden

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About