No abstract

has the potential to reduce costs and inconveniences associated with frequent patient visits. Evaluating teleophthalmology in the management of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) will allow for future implementation of this technology. OBJECTIVE To evaluate teleophthalmology as a tool for the screening and monitoring of neovascular AMD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective, randomized clinical trial that included 106 referral eyes for suspected neovascular AMD and 63 eyes with stable neovascular AMD. New referrals for patients with suspected neovascular AMD and patients with stable neovascular AMD were randomized into either routine or teleophthalmologic groups. In the routine group, patients received clinical assessment and diagnostic imaging at a tertiary hospital-based retina clinic. In the teleophthalmologic group, patients received basic examination and diagnostic imaging at a stand-alone teleophthalmologic site, where patient information and imaging studies were acquired and electronically sent over to tertiary hospital-based retina specialists. Patients in the teleophthalmologic group were called back to the tertiary treatment center if the teleophthalmologic data set suggested pathology or was inconclusive for diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient wait times for diagnosis and/or treatment, referral accuracy, and visual outcome. RESULTS For neovascular AMD screening, the average referral-to-diagnostic imaging time was 22.5 days for the teleophthalmologic group and 18.0 days for the routine group, for a difference of 4.5 days (95% CI, 11.8 to −2.8 days; P = .23). The average diagnostic imaging to treatment time was 16.4 days for the teleophthalmologic group and 11.6 days for the routine group, for a difference of 4.8 days (95% CI, 10.7 to −1.1 days; P = .11). For neovascular AMD monitoring, the average recurrence to treatment time was shorter for the routine group (0.04 days) compared with 13.6 days for the teleophthalmologic group, for a difference of −13.5 days (95% CI, −18.2 to −9.0 days; P < .01). There was no difference identified between end-of-study visual acuities in the 2 groups (P = .99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A delay of referral to treatment time could not be identified when comparing teleophthalmologic screening for suspected neovascular AMD with retinal specialist-based screening. Teleophthalmologic monitoring for neovascular AMD recurrence resulted in longer wait times for treatment reinitiation, but no adverse visual outcomes were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01581606

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Recent reports of altered TSH responsiveness to its releasing hormone (TRH) in women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) suggested that subclinical hypothyroidism may be responsible for the mood changes, such as depression, that occur in these women. In this study we measured basal and TRH-stimulated serum TSH and PRL levels in 15 women with PMS and in 19 age-matched normal women. The mean baseline serum TSH concentrations were similar in the 2 groups in both the follicular [normal, 1.3 +/- 0.2 (+/- SE); PMS, 0.9 +/- 0.2 mU/L] and luteal (normal, 1.1 +/- 0.2; PMS, 1.1 +/- 0.2 mU/L) phases of the cycle. The mean baseline serum PRL levels also were similar in the 2 groups in the follicular (normal, 16 +/- 2; PMS, 13 +/- 2 micrograms/L) and luteal (normal, 13 +/- 2; PMS, 14 +/- 2 micrograms/L) phases of the cycle. After TRH administration, peak serum PRL and TSH levels were reached at 15 and 30 min, respectively, and the response curves were virtually identical in the 2 groups in both phases of the cycle. One normal woman had elevated basal and TRH-stimulated TSH concentrations compatible with subclinical hypothyroidism, but had normal noncyclic scores on her prospective rating scales. Our findings suggest that PMS is not associated with thyroid dysfunction or abnormal PRL secretion and that thyroid hormone replacement therapy is not indicated in this condition.

No abstract

Treat and Extend dosing regimen allows similar visual outcomes to monthly dosing, while reducing the total number of injections, visits, and overall cost.