1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80040-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premenstrual syndrome: Documentation by a linear analog scale compared with two descriptive scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main efficacy variable prospectively sought in the protocol was change from baseline to end point in the combined scores of the six self assessment items (irritability, mood alteration, anger, headache, other menstrual symptoms including bloating, and breast fullness). Women rated each item using a visual analogue scale25 validated for the assessment of the premenstrual syndrome, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (unbearable), measured in millimetres on the linear scale. We chose the scale because it was validated and also because it correlates closely with other more complex tools and is a rapid and straightforward assessment of effect for use in community practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main efficacy variable prospectively sought in the protocol was change from baseline to end point in the combined scores of the six self assessment items (irritability, mood alteration, anger, headache, other menstrual symptoms including bloating, and breast fullness). Women rated each item using a visual analogue scale25 validated for the assessment of the premenstrual syndrome, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (unbearable), measured in millimetres on the linear scale. We chose the scale because it was validated and also because it correlates closely with other more complex tools and is a rapid and straightforward assessment of effect for use in community practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After informed consent was obtained, and before endometrial ablation was performed, the women evaluated the perceived severity of 6 premenstrual symptoms using 6 VASs, previously validated in a similar population [17], where a score of 0 represented an absence of symptoms and 10 represented the strongest imaginable intensity. They were instructed to fill out the VAS to reflect the greatest intensity of symptoms experienced in the 14 days before to their last menstruation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the symptoms studied, the fourth quartile was used to discriminate between severe and mild cases. Selected premenstrual symptoms were irritability, agitation/anxiety, depression/sadness, headache, swelling/bloating, and breast tenderness [17,18]. In addition, participants were asked to fill out a short survey about the presence, duration, and amount of menstrual bleeding to determine whether the endometrial ablation procedure was successful for treating the bleeding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of PMS was based on prospective confirmation of the presence of luteal phase emotional and physical symptoms which resolved before the end of menses and occurred in at least two subsequent cycles. The symptom rating scales used by the referring physicians included the Self Rating Scale for Premenstrual Tension Syndrome , the Prospective Record of the Impact and Severity of Menstrual Symptomatology (PRISM) calendar (Reid, 1985), and a visual linear analogue scale (Casper & Powell, 1986).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%