A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts on the functional evaluation of lung cancer patients has been facilitated by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS), in order to draw up recommendations and provide clinicians with clear, up-to-date guidelines on fitness for surgery and chemo-radiotherapy.The subject was divided into different topics, which were then assigned to at least two experts. The authors searched the literature according to their own strategies, with no central literature review being performed. The draft reports written by the experts on each topic were reviewed, discussed and voted on by the entire expert panel. The evidence supporting each recommendation was summarised, and graded as described by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Grading Review Group. Clinical practice guidelines were generated and finalised in a functional algorithm for risk stratification of the lung resection candidates, emphasising cardiological evaluation, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, systematic carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity and exercise testing.Contrary to lung resection, for which the scientific evidences are more robust, we were unable to recommend any specific test, cut-off value, or algorithm before chemo-radiotherapy due to the lack of data. We recommend that lung cancer patients should be managed in specialised settings by multidisciplinary teams.

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, at rest and during a steady-state dynamic leg exercise (work intensity ranging from 10 to 50 W) performed in the supine position. We compared cardiac output determined simultaneously by two methods, the Physio Flow (QcPF) and the direct Fick (QcFick) methods. Forty patients referred for right cardiac catheterisation, 14 with sleep apnoea syndrome and 26 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, took part in this study. The subjects' oxygen consumption values ranged from 0.14 to 1.19 l x min(-1). The mean difference between the two methods (QcFick - QcPF) was 0.04 l x min(-1) at rest and 0.29 l x min(-1) during exercise. The limits of agreement, defined as mean difference +/- 2SD, were -1.34, +1.41 l x min(-1)] at rest and -2.34, +2.92 l x min(-1) during exercise. The difference between the two methods exceeded 20% in only 2.5% of the cases at rest, and 9.3% of the cases during exercise. Thoracic hyperinflation did not alter QcPF. We conclude that the Physio Flow provides a clinically acceptable and non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output under these conditions. This new impedance cardiograph device deserves further study using other populations and situations.

One of the greatest challenges in exercise physiology is to develop a valid, reliable, non-invasive and affordable measurement of cardiac output (CO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, during a 1-min step incremental exercise test from rest to maximal peak effort. A group of 12 subjects was evaluated to determine the reproducibility of the method as follows: (1) each subject performed two comparable tests while their CO was measured by impedance cardiography using the new device (COImp1, COImp2), and (2) in a subgroup of 7 subjects CO was also determined by the direct Fick method (COFick) during the second test. The mean difference between the values obtained by impedance (i.e. COImp1-COImp2) was -0.009 l.min-1 (95% confidence interval: -4.2 l.min-1, 4.2 l.min-1), and CO ranged from 3.55 l.min-1 to 26.75 l.min-1 (n = 146). When expressed as a percentage, the difference (COImp1-COImp2) did not vary with increasing CO. The correlation coefficient between the values of COImp and COFick obtained during the second exercise test was r = 0.94 (P < 0.01, n = 50). The mean difference expressed as percentage was -2.78% (95% confidence interval: -27.44%, 21.78%). We conclude that COImp provides a clinically acceptable evaluation of CO in healthy subjects during an incremental exercise.

We have recently demonstrated that the overnight profiles of cardiac interbeat autocorrelation coefficient of R-R intervals ( r RR) calculated at 1-min intervals are related to the changes in sleep electroencephalographic (EEG) mean frequency, which reflect depth of sleep. Other quantitative measures of the Poincaré plots, i.e., the standard deviation of normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square difference among successive R-R normal intervals (RMSSD), are commonly used to evaluate heart rate variability. The present study was designed to compare the nocturnal profiles of r RR, SDNN, and RMSSD with the R-R spectral power components: high-frequency (HF) power, reflecting parasympathetic activity; low-frequency (LF) power, reflecting a predominance of sympathetic activity with a parasympathetic component; and the LF-to-HF ratio (LF/HF), regarded as an index of sympathovagal balance. r RR, SDNN, RMSSD, and the spectral power components were calculated every 5 min during sleep in 15 healthy subjects. The overnight profiles of r RR and LF/HF showed coordinate variations with highly significant correlation coefficients ( P < 0.001 in all subjects). SDNN correlated with LF power ( P < 0.001), and RMSSD correlated with HF power ( P < 0.001). The overnight profiles of r RR and EEG mean frequency were found to be closely related with highly cross-correlated coefficients ( P < 0.001). SDNN and EEG mean frequency were also highly cross correlated ( P < 0.001 in all subjects but 1). No systematic relationship was found between RMSSD and EEG mean frequency. In conclusion, r RR appears to be a new tool for evaluating the dynamic beat-to-beat interval behavior and the sympathovagal balance continuously during sleep. This nonlinear method may provide new insight into autonomic disorders.

Lung adenocarcinoma is the most common cell type in females (smokers or non-smokers) and in non-smoking males. Its incidence has been increasing in younger cohorts of males and females until very recent years. Changes in classification and in pathological techniques account for some of this increase. In females and non-smoker males, the increase could be partly due to a detection bias in former studies. Nevertheless, successive cohorts over time seem more likely to develop adenocarcinoma and less likely to develop squamous cell carcinoma. These differences between birth cohorts suggest that the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma is not only due to changes in pathological diagnosis. Geographical differences are also observed: in Europe, the squamous cell type still predominates and an increase in incidence of adenocarcinoma has only been reported in the Netherlands. In Asia, in the 1960s and 1970s, the proportion of adenocarcinoma was higher than in North America or Europe and seems to be increasing. To what extent these differences are due to differences. In establishing diagnosis remains unknown. Despite these biases in temporal and geographical trends detailed in this review, there has probably been a true increase in incidence of adenocarcinoma. An explanation for this should be sought in studies on detailed smoking history and passive smoking exposure, occupational exposure, diet and cooking, pollution and other environmental factors.