The circadian rhythms of melatonin and body temperature are set to an earlier hour in women than in men, even when the women and men maintain nearly identical and consistent bedtimes and wake times. Moreover, women tend to wake up earlier than men and exhibit a greater preference for morning activities than men. Although the neurobiological mechanism underlying this sex difference in circadian alignment is unknown, multiple studies in nonhuman animals have demonstrated a sex difference in circadian period that could account for such a difference in circadian alignment between women and men. Whether a sex difference in intrinsic circadian period in humans underlies the difference in circadian alignment between men and women is unknown. We analyzed precise estimates of intrinsic circadian period collected from 157 individuals (52 women, 105 men; aged 18-74 y) studied in a month-long inpatient protocol designed to minimize confounding influences on circadian period estimation. Overall, the average intrinsic period of the melatonin and temperature rhythms in this population was very close to 24 h [24.15 ± 0.2 h (24 h 9 min ± 12 min)]. We further found that the intrinsic circadian period was significantly shorter in women [24.09 ± 0.2 h (24 h 5 min ± 12 min)] than in men [24.19 ± 0.2 h (24 h 11 min ± 12 min); P < 0.01] and that a significantly greater proportion of women have intrinsic circadian periods shorter than 24.0 h (35% vs. 14%; P < 0.01). The shorter average intrinsic circadian period observed in women may have implications for understanding sex differences in habitual sleep duration and insomnia prevalence.biological rhythm | gender | phase angle O n average, women go to bed earlier and wake up earlier than men, and they are more likely to rate themselves as morning types than men on standardized questionnaires (1). We recently reported a substantial sex difference in the entrainment of human circadian rhythms, such that the circadian rhythms of melatonin and temperature were entrained to an earlier time relative to the nightly sleep/darkness episode in women compared with men (2). The neurobiological mechanism underlying this sex difference in entrained circadian phase, which may have important implications for sleep quality and daytime alertness in women, remains unknown. Animal studies suggest that such differences in entrainment, technically called a phase angle difference between an endogenous rhythm (e.g., nightly secretion of melatonin) and the 24-h environmental light-dark (and wakesleep cycle) to which the rhythm is synchronized, may be attributable to underlying differences in either the resetting sensitivity to environmental synchronizers or the intrinsic period of the circadian pacemaker(s) driving circadian rhythmicity (3-5). Little is known about sex differences in the sensitivity to photic resetting in humans, and no sex difference in the sensitivity to melatonin suppression by light has been reported in most studies (6)(7)(8). Findings from multiple studies in nonhuman animals have demonstra...

Cortisol and inflammatory proteins are released into the blood in response to stressors and chronic elevations of blood cortisol and inflammatory proteins may contribute to ongoing disease processes and could be useful biomarkers of disease. How chronic circadian misalignment influences cortisol and inflammatory proteins, however, is largely unknown and this was the focus of the current study. Specifically, we examined the influence of weeks of chronic circadian misalignment on cortisol, stress ratings, and pro- and anti- inflammatory proteins in humans. We also compared the effects of acute total sleep deprivation and chronic circadian misalignment on cortisol levels. Healthy, drug free females and males (N=17) aged 20-41 participated. After three weeks of maintaining consistent sleep-wake schedules at home, six laboratory baseline days and nights, a 40-h constant routine (CR, total sleep deprivation) to examine circadian rhythms for melatonin and cortisol, participants were scheduled to a 25-day laboratory entrainment protocol that resulted in sleep and circadian disruption for eight of the participants. A second constant routine was conducted to reassess melatonin and cortisol rhythms on days 34-35. Plasma cortisol levels were also measured during sampling windows every week and trapezoidal area under the curve (AUC) was used to estimate 24-h cortisol levels. Inflammatory proteins were assessed at baseline and near the end of the entrainment protocol. Acute total sleep deprivation significantly increased cortisol levels (p<0.0001), whereas chronic circadian misalignment significantly reduced cortisol levels (p<0.05). Participants who exhibited normal circadian phase relationships with the wakefulness-sleep schedule showed little change in cortisol levels. Stress ratings increased during acute sleep deprivation (p<0.0001), whereas stress ratings remained low across weeks of study for both the misaligned and synchronized control group. Circadian misalignment significantly increased plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.05). Little change was observed for the TNF-α/IL-10 ratio during circadian misalignment, whereas the TNF-α/IL-10 ratio and CRP levels decreased in the synchronized control group across weeks of circadian entrainment. The current findings demonstrate that total sleep deprivation and chronic circadian misalignment modulate cortisol levels and that chronic circadian misalignment increases plasma concentrations of pro- and antiinflammatory proteins.

Key points• Light is the strongest time cue for entrainment and phase resetting of the circadian clock.• In humans, exposure to long-duration light (6.5 h) in the late evening/early night causes phase delays, suppresses melatonin and increases alertness.• Here we studied the effects of different durations of exposure to a single high-intensity (∼10,000 lux) light pulse (0.2 h, 1 h, 2.5 h and 4.0 h) on phase shifting, suppression of melatonin and self-reported sleepiness in young men and women.• Phase-resetting and melatonin-suppression responses were dose dependent and non-linear;shorter light exposures more efficiently phase-shift the clock, suppress melatonin and induce alertness.Abstract Light exposure in the early night induces phase delays of the circadian rhythm in melatonin in humans. Previous studies have investigated the effect of timing, intensity, wavelength, history and pattern of light stimuli on the human circadian timing system. We present results from a study of the duration-response relationship to phase-delaying bright light. Thirty-nine young healthy participants (16 female; 22.18 ± 3.62 years) completed a 9-day inpatient study. Following three baseline days, participants underwent an initial circadian phase assessment procedure in dim light (<3 lux), and were then randomized for exposure to a bright light pulse (∼10,000 lux) of 0.2 h, 1.0 h, 2.5 h or 4.0 h duration during a 4.5 h controlled-posture episode centred in a 16 h wake episode. After another 8 h sleep episode, participants completed a second circadian phase assessment. Phase shifts were calculated from the difference in the clock time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) between the initial and final phase assessments. Exposure to varying durations of bright light reset the circadian pacemaker in a dose-dependent, non-linear manner. Per minute of exposure, the 0.2 h duration was over 5 times more effective at phase delaying the circadian pacemaker (1.07 ± 0.36 h) as compared with the 4.0 h duration (2.65 ± 0.24 h). Acute melatonin suppression and subjective sleepiness also had a dose-dependent response to light exposure duration. These results provide strong evidence for a non-linear resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker to light duration.

In addition to rods and cones, the human retina contains light-sensitive ganglion cells that express melanopsin, a photopigment with signal transduction mechanisms similar to that of invertebrate rhabdomeric photopigments (IRP). Like fly rhodopsins, melanopsin acts as a dual-state photosensitive flip-flop in which light drives both phototransduction responses and chromophore photoregeneration that bestows independence from the retinoid cycle required by rods and cones to regenerate photoresponsiveness following bleaching by light. To explore the hypothesis that melanopsin in humans expresses the properties of a bistable photopigment in vivo we used the pupillary light reflex (PLR) as a tool but with methods designed to study invertebrate photoreceptors. We show that the pupil only attains a fully stabilized state of constriction after several minutes of light exposure, a feature that is consistent with typical IRP photoequilibrium spectra. We further demonstrate that previous exposure to long wavelength light increases, while short wavelength light decreases the amplitude of pupil constriction, a fundamental property of IRP difference spectra. Modelling these responses to invertebrate photopigment templates yields two putative spectra for the underlying R and M photopigment states with peaks at 481 nm and 587 nm respectively. Furthermore, this bistable mechanism may confer a novel form of “photic memory” since information of prior light conditions is retained and shapes subsequent responses to light. These results suggest that the human retina exploits fly-like photoreceptive mechanisms that are potentially important for the modulation of non-visual responses to light and highlights the ubiquitous nature of photoswitchable photosensors across living organisms.

The internal circadian clock and sleep-wake homeostasis regulate the timing of human brain function, physiology, and behavior so that wakefulness and its associated functions are optimal during the solar day and that sleep and its related functions are optimal at night. The maintenance of a normal phase relationship between the internal circadian clock, sleep-wake homeostasis, and the light-dark cycle is crucial for optimal neurobehavioral and physiological function. Here, the authors show that the phase relationship between these factors-the phase angle of entrainment (psi)-is strongly determined by the intrinsic period (tau) of the master circadian clock and the strength of the circadian synchronizer. Melatonin was used as a marker of internal biological time, and circadian period was estimated during a forced desynchrony protocol. The authors observed relationships between the phase angle of entrainment and intrinsic period after exposure to scheduled habitual wakefulness-sleep light-dark cycle conditions inside and outside of the laboratory. Individuals with shorter circadian periods initiated sleep and awakened at a later biological time than did individuals with longer circadian periods. The authors also observed that light exposure history influenced the phase angle of entrainment such that phase angle was shorter following exposure to a moderate bright light (approximately 450 lux)-dark/wakefulness-sleep schedule for 5 days than exposure to the equivalent of an indoor daytime light (approximately 150 lux)-dark/wakefulness-sleep schedule for 2 days. These findings demonstrate that neurobiological and environmental factors interact to regulate the phase angle of entrainment in humans. This finding has important implications for understanding physiological organization by the brain's master circadian clock and may have implications for understanding mechanisms underlying circadian sleep disorders.

Introduction Light elicits a range of non‐visual responses in humans. Driven predominantly by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), but also by rods and/or cones, these responses include melatonin suppression. A sigmoidal relationship has been established between melatonin suppression and light intensity; however, photoreceptoral involvement remains unclear. Methods and Results In this study, we first modelled the relationships between alpha‐opic illuminances and melatonin suppression using an extensive dataset by Brainard and colleagues. Our results show that (a) melatonin suppression is better predicted by melanopic illuminance compared to other alpha‐opic illuminances, (b) melatonin suppression is predicted to occur at levels as low as ~1.5 melanopic lux (melanopsin‐weighted irradiance 0.2 µW/cm2), (c) saturation occurs at 305 melanopic lux (melanopsin‐weighted irradiance 36.6 µW/cm2). We then tested this melanopsin‐weighted illuminance‐response model derived from Brainard and colleagues' data and show that it predicts equally well melatonin suppression data from our laboratory, although obtained using different intensities and exposure duration. Discussion Together, our findings suggest that melatonin suppression by monochromatic lights is predominantly driven by melanopsin and that it can be initiated at extremely low melanopic lux levels in experimental conditions. This emphasizes the concern of the non‐visual impacts of low light intensities in lighting design and light‐emitting devices.

We have recently demonstrated that the overnight profiles of cardiac interbeat autocorrelation coefficient of R-R intervals ( r RR) calculated at 1-min intervals are related to the changes in sleep electroencephalographic (EEG) mean frequency, which reflect depth of sleep. Other quantitative measures of the Poincaré plots, i.e., the standard deviation of normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square difference among successive R-R normal intervals (RMSSD), are commonly used to evaluate heart rate variability. The present study was designed to compare the nocturnal profiles of r RR, SDNN, and RMSSD with the R-R spectral power components: high-frequency (HF) power, reflecting parasympathetic activity; low-frequency (LF) power, reflecting a predominance of sympathetic activity with a parasympathetic component; and the LF-to-HF ratio (LF/HF), regarded as an index of sympathovagal balance. r RR, SDNN, RMSSD, and the spectral power components were calculated every 5 min during sleep in 15 healthy subjects. The overnight profiles of r RR and LF/HF showed coordinate variations with highly significant correlation coefficients ( P < 0.001 in all subjects). SDNN correlated with LF power ( P < 0.001), and RMSSD correlated with HF power ( P < 0.001). The overnight profiles of r RR and EEG mean frequency were found to be closely related with highly cross-correlated coefficients ( P < 0.001). SDNN and EEG mean frequency were also highly cross correlated ( P < 0.001 in all subjects but 1). No systematic relationship was found between RMSSD and EEG mean frequency. In conclusion, r RR appears to be a new tool for evaluating the dynamic beat-to-beat interval behavior and the sympathovagal balance continuously during sleep. This nonlinear method may provide new insight into autonomic disorders.

It has been shown in animal studies that exposure to brief pulses of bright light can phase shift the circadian pacemaker and that the resetting action of light is most efficient during the first minutes of light exposure. In humans, multiple consecutive days of exposure to brief bright light pulses have been shown to phase shift the circadian pacemaker. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a single sequence of brief bright light pulses administered during the early biological night would phase delay the human circadian pacemaker. Twenty-one healthy young subjects underwent a 6.5-h light exposure session in one of three randomly assigned conditions: 1) continuous bright light of ∼9,500 lux, 2) intermittent bright light (six 15-min bright light pulses of ∼9,500 lux separated by 60 min of very dim light of <1 lux), and 3) continuous very dim light of <1 lux. Twenty subjects were included in the analysis. Core body temperature (CBT) and melatonin were used as phase markers of the circadian pacemaker. Phase delays of CBT and melatonin rhythms in response to intermittent bright light pulses were comparable to those measured after continuous bright light exposure, even though the total exposure to the intermittent bright light represented only 23% of the 6.5-h continuous exposure. These results demonstrate that a single sequence of intermittent bright light pulses can phase delay the human circadian pacemaker and show that intermittent pulses have a greater resetting efficacy on a per minute basis than does continuous exposure.