The article presents the results of 2018—2020 study of 22 early-maturing group soybeans samples of the collection nursery; those samples are of various ecological-geographical origin according to adaptability parameters, plasticity and stability in the conditions of the south of the Amur region, the analysis of yield variability was carried out. The research was carried out on the experimental field of the laboratory of selection and genetics of soybeans FSBSI FSC All-Russian Scientific and Recearch Center of soybean, Sadovoye village, Tambov region. The average varietal soybean seeds yield in the years of research amounted to 2.37 t/ha. Based on the results of agro-ecological assessment of 22 soybean samples, adaptive, plastic and stable samples have been identified, which have an insignificant variation indicator in yield: Heihe 25 (V=3.23%; Ка=1.14; bi=1.00; Si2=0.03), Hei 06–1625 (V=4.69%; Ка=1.06; bi=1.29; Si2=0.01), Hei 05–1031 (V=3.74%; Ка=1.03; bi=1.60; Si2=0.01) and McCall (V=2.34%; Ка=1.06; bi=1.03; Si2=0.01). These genotypes are of practical interest as initial parent forms in selection for adaptability in conditions of the Amur region.
Abstract. The purpose is to study correlation dependence of soybean varieties yield on hydrothermal conditions of the southern zone of the Amur region. Methods. The subject of research are local recognized standard soybean varieties – Lidiya, Dauriya, and Alena. The experimental part of the work was carried out in 2017–2021 on the experimental field of the Soybean Breeding and Genetics Laboratory of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution Federal Research Center All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Soybean (FSBSI FRC ARSRIS). The varieties were studied in the nursery of competitive variety testing. Sowing was carried out in triplicate by the method of randomized repetitions (blocks) in the period from May 19 to May 21 using a SN-P-16 seeder. The plot area is 40.5 m2. During the growing season, cultivation, manual weeding, phenological observations and visual assessments were carried out. The plots were harvested by continuous threshing with a Sampo 130 combine. The yield of varieties was determined in terms of standard moisture content (14 %). Results. In the course of the yield data analysis of varieties depending on weather conditions it was found that 2019 and 2020 were excessively wet (HTF – 2.6; 2.4), optimum conditions developed in 2017 (HTF – 1.7). The highest average varietal yield (26.5) over the years of research was noted in 2017, the lowest (23.4 c/ha) – in adverse meteorological conditions of 2018, due to drought period of the early plant growth and heavy storm rainfall afterwards. It was found in the course of research that formation of the Lidiya soybean variety yield is mainly influenced by the effective heat sum during periods of sprouting – flowering and flowering – ripening (r = 0.51 and –0.53). The productivity of the Dauriya variety is more dependent on the air temperature (r = –0.61) and total precipitation, and HTF of flowering – ripening periods (r = 0.62; 0.67). The Alena soybean variety showed a fairly close correlation dependence of the productivity on the effective heat sum of the periods of dropping – sprouting and flowering – ripening (r = –0.87 and –0.68), and the amount of precipitation and HTF of the period sprouting – flowering (r = –0.64 and –0.60 respectively). Scientific novelty. Special aspects of meteorological effects on the yield of soybean varieties of various ripeness groups have been established; the correlation between them have been determined. It has been found that all studied varieties are highly adapted to changing weather and climatic conditions of the Amur Region.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.