Coevolutionary interactions are thought to have spurred the evolution of key innovations and driven the diversification of much of life on Earth. However, the genetic and evolutionary basis of the innovations that facilitate such interactions remains poorly understood. We examined the coevolutionary interactions between plants (Brassicales) and butterflies (Pieridae), and uncovered evidence for an escalating evolutionary arms-race. Although gradual changes in trait complexity appear to have been facilitated by allelic turnover, key innovations are associated with gene and genome duplications. Furthermore, we show that the origins of both chemical defenses and of molecular counter adaptations were associated with shifts in diversification rates during the arms-race. These findings provide an important connection between the origins of biodiversity, coevolution, and the role of gene and genome duplications as a substrate for novel traits.ver half a century ago, Ehrlich and Raven (1) coined the term 'coevolution' and proposed that coevolutionary interactions between species with close ecological relationships generated much of the eukaryotic biodiversity on Earth. One of their primary examples of coevolution was the chemically mediated interactions between butterflies of the subfamily Pierinae (Pieridae, Lepidoptera) and their angiosperm host-plants in the order Brassicales. Members of the plant order Brassicales are united by their production of secondary metabolites called glucosinolates (i.e., mustard oils). Upon tissue damage, glucosinolates are modified into toxins long studied for their defensive properties and flavor (e.g., mustard and horseradish) (2). In the Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress) genome, at least 52 genes are involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis (3, 4) and some exhibit strong evidence of adaptive evolution that is attributed to herbivore mediated selection (5, 6). Pierinae caterpillars detoxify the glucosinolates of their Brassicales host-plants by redirecting these otherwise toxic breakdown products to inert metabolites using a gene that encodes a nitrile-specifier protein (7). The key innovation of the Brassicales, defensive glucosinolates, evolved roughly 90 million years ago (Ma); within 10 million years, Pierinae responded with their own key innovation, the nitrilespecifier protein, and colonized the Brassicales. Subsequently, Pierinae net diversification rates increased compared with that of their sister clade Coliadinae, whose members did not colonize Brassicales (8).Although these studies provide "perhaps the most convincing example" that the evolution of a key innovation resulted in an increased net diversification rate (9), much remains unknown about the origins and subsequent evolutionary dynamics of the key innovations that have had macroevolutionary consequences. To address this gap in the literature, here we further investigate these key innovations in the aforementioned plant and butterfly lineages by (i) assessing if these innovations increased in complexity over time and are...

The orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina shows a stable and dramatic flower-color polymorphism, with both yellow-and purple-flowered individuals present in natural populations throughout the range of the species in Europe. The evolutionary significance of flower-color polymorphisms found in many rewardless orchid species has been discussed at length, but the mechanisms responsible for their maintenance remain unclear. Laboratory experiments have suggested that behavioral responses by pollinators to lack of reward availability might result in a reproductive advantage for rare-color morphs. Consequently, we performed an experiment varying the relative frequency of the two color morphs of D. sambucina to test whether rare morph advantage acted in the natural habitat of the species. We show here clear evidence from this manipulative experiment that rare-color morphs have reproductive advantage through male and female components. This is the first demonstration, to our knowledge, that negative frequency-dependent selection through pollinator preference for rare morphs can cause the maintenance of a flower-color polymorphism.

Epiphytes are a characteristic component of tropical rainforests. Out of the 25 000 orchid species currently known to science, more than 70% live in tree canopies. Understanding when and how these orchids diversified is vital to understanding the history of epiphytic biomes. We investigated whether orchids managed to radiate so explosively owing to their predominantly epiphytic habit and/or their specialized pollinator systems by testing these hypotheses from a statistical and phylogenetic standpoint. For the first approach, species numbers of 100 randomly chosen epiphytic and terrestrial genera were compared. Furthermore, the mean number of pollinators per orchid species within the five subfamilies was calculated and correlated with their time of diversification and species richness. In the second approach, molecular epiphytic orchid phylogenies were screened for clades with specific suites of epiphytic adaptations. Epiphytic genera were found to be significantly richer in species than terrestrial genera both for orchids and non-orchids. No evidence was found for a positive association between pollinator specialization and orchid species richness. Repeated associations between a small body size, short life cycle and specialized clinging roots of twig epiphytes in Bulbophyllinae and Oncidiinae were discovered. The development of twig epiphytism in the first group seems repeatedly correlated with speciation bursts.

Many species of nonmodel deceptively pollinated orchids are polymorphic for corolla color. These species are pollinated by naive insects searching for nectar, and are not mimics. It has been suggested that the foraging behavior of insect pollinators during the avoidance learning process results in these stable corolla color polymorphisms; for this to occur pollinators must induce negative frequency-dependent selection on corolla color. Therefore the hypothesis that pollinator behavior results in a preference for rare color morphs of deceptive species was tested experimentally. Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) foraged in the laboratory on arrays of artificial flowers with different corolla color morphs. Morphs were varied in frequency, and bumblebee preferences were recorded on arrays where morphs did and did not contain sucrose solution rewards. Bumblebees preferred the most common color morph when flowers contained sucrose solution rewards, but overvisited rare morphs when sampling flowers that contained no rewards. Bumblebees also tended to move between unlike color morphs when these were unrewarding, suggesting that a probabilistic sampling strategy was adopted. Thus experiments demonstrated that pollinator behavior could result in a selective advantage for rare color morphs of plant species that are pollinated by deception without mimicry, which would induce negative frequency-dependent selection on corolla color. The observed pollinator behavior could allow stable corolla color polymorphisms to be maintained by selection in nonmodel deceptively pollinated species.

Bomhus trwestris, a typical pollinating insect species, was offered artificial flowers of two different corolla colours with the same sucrose solution reward in an array. Common colours were significantly preferred, and the strength of the frequency-dependent response increased as a result of learning. There were also frequency-independent biases towards blue flowers, probably because blue flowers appeared more conspicuous to bumblebees than yellow flowers, and the degree of preference for blue was greater when flowers had low nectar rewards. Flower-to-flower movements by individual bumblebees between flowers were non-random, were biased to movements within the same flower colour, and were also dependent on morph frequency. The mechanisms governing flower selection in bumblebees are discussed.Pollinators foraging similarly in a natural situation would induce positive frequency-dependent selection, assortative mating, and directional selection on different corolla colour morphs of the plant population being visited, resulting in stabilizing selection for a single flower colour.introduction

More than one-third of orchid species do not provide their pollinators with either pollen or nectar rewards. Floral mimicry could explain the maintenance of these rewardless orchid species, but most rewardless orchids do not appear to have a rewarding plant that they mimic specifically. We tested the hypothesis that floral mimicry can occur through similarity based on corolla colour alone, using naive bumble-bees foraging on arrays of plants with one rewarding model species, and one rewardless putative mimic species (Dactylorhiza sambucina) which had two colour morphs. We found that when bees were inexperienced, they visited both rewardless morphs randomly. However, after bees had gained experience with the rewarding model, and it was removed from the experiment, bees resampled preferentially the rewardless morph most similar to it in corolla colour. This is the first clear evidence, to our knowledge, that pollinators could select for floral mimicry. We suggest that floral mimicry can be a selective force acting on rewardless orchids, but only under some ecological conditions. In particular, we argue that selection on early-flowering rewardless orchids that receive visits from a large pool of naive pollinators will be weakly influenced by mimicry.

Summary• Many orchids produce no nectar rewards. Foraging pollinators should visit more flowers per inflorescence in species with nectar, which could increase geitonogamous self-fertilization. If a history of selfing decreases genetic load, then nectar-producing orchids should harbour lower inbreeding depression than nectarless species.• Here, I tested this hypothesis by quantifying inbreeding depression and pollinator limitation in populations of three closely related orchid species, one of which provides nectar. I also compared inbreeding depression for nectarless and nectar-producing species of orchids using published studies.• All field populations expressed pollinator limitation, but the nectar-providing species was intermediate to the two nectarless species. All populations expressed inbreeding depression, and levels increased in later life-history stages. There was no tendency for nectarless species to express higher inbreeding depression either in experiments or published studies.• Nectarless orchids may not express higher levels of inbreeding depression because pollinators fail to visit more flowers in nectar-bearing species, because such visitations do not result in greater selfing, and/or because higher selfing may be ineffective in purging the mutations that cause load.

The Orchidaceae characteristically contain a very large number of species that attract pollinators but do not offer them any form of reward in return for visitation. Such a strategy is highly unusual in the plant kingdom. We conducted experiments in order to manipulate the reward strategy of the rewardless bumble-bee-pollinated orchid Barlia robertiana by adding sucrose solution to inflorescences. We found that supplementation decreased the probability of a pollinator removing pollinia by approximately ten times. Despite pollinators visiting many more flowers per inflorescence on supplemented plants, eight times fewer pollinia were removed from supplemented inflorescences during each visit. Pollinia deposition patterns were not significantly affected by supplementation and no geitonogamous deposition was recorded. In populations where inflorescences were supplemented for 20 days, pollinia removal was reduced by over half for supplemented inflorescences, whereas fruit set was unmodified by supplementation. We conclude that rewardlessness would increase total seed paternity, but not change either total seed maternity or the probability that offspring were outcrossed in this species. To the authors' knowledge this is the first time that there has been an unequivocal experimental demonstration of an evolutionary advantage for rewardlessness in the Orchidaceae.