This study examines whether psychopathic traits in a nonreferred (and presumably nonpsychopathic) sample could enhance the accuracy of perceptions of victim vulnerability. In a previous study, the interpersonal and affective component of psychopathy was associated with increased accuracy in assessing vulnerability in dyadic conversations, and Grayson and Stein (1981) established that vulnerability could be assessed by observing targets walking. The purpose of this study was to determine whether individuals scoring higher on psychopathic traits would be better able to judge vulnerability to victimization after viewing short clips of targets walking. Participants provided a vulnerability estimate for each target and completed the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale: Version III (SRP-III). Higher SRP-III scores were associated with greater accuracy in assessing targets' vulnerability to victimization. Implications for the prevention of victimization are discussed.
The relationship between psychopathic traits and the perception of nonverbal communication, including facial expressions and body language, is investigated. Participants include 59 prison inmates and 60 community members. Psychopathic traits among inmates are measured using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and Levenson's Self Report Psychopathy Scale. Participants categorize the emotion of posed facial photographs and rate intensity of emotion. They view videotaped interactions of a confederate and a target individual and rate assertiveness using the Rathus Assertiveness Scale. There is a trend for the PCL-R to be positively correlated with the inmates' accuracy of emotional intensity ratings. Psychopathic traits are also positively associated with the accuracy of assertiveness ratings. P sychopathy is characterized by irresponsibility, impulsivity, antisocial behavior, an inability to learn from punishment, and a lack of long-term goals (Cleckley, 1941). The key characteristics of psychopathy are measured in the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991). The 20-item instrument was originally thought to consist of two factors: (a) affective and interpersonal symptoms, such as reduced affect, lack of empathy, manipulativeness, and lack of remorse, and (b) symptoms of social deviance, including a lack of long-term goals and behavioral problems. Patrick (1994) aptly relabeled these factors emotional detachment and antisocial behavior. Other research has suggested the existence of three factors (Cooke & Michie, 2001), and at the point of the last revision of the PCL-R, factor analyses indicate that there are four facets (subsumed under the two factors given above; Hare, 2003): interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, and antisocial. The interpersonal and affective facets make up the interpersonal/affective component (Factor 1), and the lifestyle and antisocial facets make up the social deviance component (Factor 2).Because affect and empathy are typically attenuated in psychopaths, Cleckley (1941) suggested that psychopaths suffer from emotional poverty, a view that is shared by others 531
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.