The basic machinery for the translocation of proteins into or across membranes is remarkably conserved from Escherichia coli to humans. In eukaryotes, proteins are inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum using the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor, as well as the integral membrane Sec61 trimeric complex (composed of alpha, beta and gamma subunits). In bacteria, most proteins are inserted by a related pathway that includes the SRP homologue Ffh, the SRP receptor FtsY, and the SecYEG trimeric complex, where Y and E are related to the Sec61 alpha and gamma subunits, respectively. Proteins in bacteria that exhibit no dependence on the Sec translocase were previously thought to insert into the membrane directly without the aid of a protein machinery. Here we show that membrane insertion of two Sec-independent proteins requires YidC. YidC is essential for E. coli viability and homologues are present in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Depletion of YidC also interferes with insertion of Sec-dependent membrane proteins, but it has only a minor effect on the export of secretory proteins. These results provide evidence for an additional component of the translocation machinery that is specialized for the integration of membrane proteins.

No abstract

The quantitative analysis of protein mixtures is pivotal for the understanding of variations in the proteome of living systems. Therefore, approaches have been recently devised that generally allow the relative quantitative analysis of peptides and proteins. Here we present proof of concept of the new metal-coded affinity tag (MeCAT) technique, which allowed the quantitative determination of peptides and proteins. A macrocyclic metal chelate complex (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)) loaded with different lanthanides (metal(III) ions) was the essential part of the tag. The combination of DOTA with an affinity anchor for purification and a reactive group for reaction with amino acids constituted a reagent that allowed quantification of peptides and proteins in an absolute fashion. For the quantitative determination, the tagged peptides and proteins were analyzed using flow injection inductively coupled plasma MS, a technique that allowed detection of metals with high precision and low detection limits. The metal chelate complexes were attached to the cysteine residues, and the course of the labeling reaction was followed using SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF MS, ESI MS, and inductively coupled plasma MS. To limit the width in isotopic signal spread and to increase the sensitivity for ESI analysis, we used the monoisotopic lanthanide macrocycle complexes. Peptides tagged with the reagent loaded with different metals coelute in liquid chromatography. In first applications with proteins, the calculated detection limit for bovine serum albumin for example was 110 amol, and we have used MeCAT to analyze proteins of the Sus scrofa eye lens as a model system. These data showed that MeCAT allowed quantification not only of peptides but also of proteins in an absolute fashion at low concentrations and in complex mixtures. Proteomics as a field of research is based on the characterization of an entire proteome of a biological system. A variety of approaches have been developed during the last decades to characterize such mixtures of proteins and peptides, and necessarily, all of them use separation techniques. At the protein level, separation has been achieved using 2-D 1 gel electrophoresis (1) and densitometry of stained proteins or fluorescence detection (2). After digestion of the proteins, peptides were identified using liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, or both (3, 4). However, this information was only qualitative. It became rapidly evident that quantitative data were definitively required, e.g. for the characterization of dynamic biological systems or the search for biomarkers in clinical proteomics. Subsequently methods have been developed for the quantitative determination of proteins and peptides mainly based on chemical or metabolic isotopic labeling combined with LC/MS n detection (5, 6). Label-free LC/MS quantitative strategies are under development as well (7).Using such techniques, the investigation of changes of the proteome in biological systems has become possible. However, o...

YidC is a recently discovered bacterial membrane protein that is related to the mitochondrial Oxa1p and the Alb3 protein of chloroplasts. These proteins are required in the membrane integration process of newly synthesized proteins that do not require the classical Sec machinery. Here we demonstrate that YidC is sufficient for the membrane integration of a Sec-independent protein. Microgram amounts of the purified single-spanning Pf3 coat protein were efficiently inserted into proteoliposomes containing the purified YidC. A mutant Pf3 coat protein with an extended hydrophobic region was inserted independently of YidC into the membrane both in vivo and in vitro, but its insertion was accelerated by YidC. These results show that YidC can function separately from the Sec translocase to integrate membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer.

Assembly of several inner membrane proteins-leader peptidase (Lep), a Lep derivative (Lep-inv) that inserts with an inverted topology compared with the wild-type protein, the phage M13 procoat protein, and a procoat derivative (H1-procoat) with the hydrophobic core of the signal peptide replaced by a stretch from the first transmembrane segment in Lep-has been studied in vitro and in Escherichia coli strains that are conditional for the expression of either the 54 homologue (Ffh) or 4.5S RNA, which are the two components of the E. coli signal recognition particle (SRP), or SecE, an essential core component of the E. coli preprotein translocase. Membrane insertion has also been tested in a SecB null strain. Lep, Lep-inv, and H1-procoat require SRP for correct assembly into the inner membrane; in contrast, we find that wild-type procoat does not. Lep and, surprisingly, Lep-inv and H1-procoat fail to insert properly when SecE is depleted, whereas insertion of wild-type procoat is unaffected under these conditions. None of the proteins depend on SecB for assembly. These observations indicate that inner membrane proteins can assemble either by a mechanism in which SRP delivers the protein at the preprotein translocase or by what appears to be a direct integration into the lipid bilayer. The observed change in assembly mechanism when the hydrophobicity of the procoat signal peptide is increased demonstrates that the assembly of an inner membrane protein can be rerouted between different pathways.

YidC is a newly defined translocase component that mediates the insertion of proteins into the membrane bilayer. How YidC functions in the insertion process is not known. In this study, we report that the Sec-independent Pf3 coat protein requires the YidC protein specifically for the membrane translocation step. Using photocrosslinking techniques and ribosome-bound Pf3 coat derivatives with an extended carboxyl-terminal region, we found that the transmembrane region of the Pf3 coat protein physically interacts with YidC and the bacterial signal recognition particle Ffh component. We also find that in the insertion pathway, Pf3 coat interacts strongly with YidC only after its transmembrane segment is fully exposed outside the ribosome tunnel. Interaction between Pf3 coat and YidC occurs even in the absence of the proton motive force and with a Pf3 coat mutant that is defective in transmembrane insertion. Our study demonstrates that YidC can directly interact with a Sec-independent membrane protein, and the role of YidC is at the stage of folding the Pf3 protein into a transmembrane configuration.

Numerous membrane proteins form multisubunit protein complexes, which contain both integral and peripheral subunits, in addition to prosthetic groups. Bacterial membrane proteins are inserted into the inner membrane by the Sec translocase and YidC insertase. Their folding can be facilitated by YidC and the phospholipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). Glycine zippers and other motifs promote transmembrane-transmembrane (TM-TM) helix interactions that may lead to the formation of α-helical bundles of membrane proteins. During or after membrane insertion, the subunits of oligomeric membrane proteins must find each other to build the homo-oligomeric and the hetero-oligomeric membrane complexes. Although chaperones may function as assembly factors in the formation of the oligomer, many protein oligomers appear to fold and oligomerize spontaneously. Current studies show that most subunits of hetero-oligomers follow a sequential and ordered pathway to form the membrane protein complex. If the inserted protein is misfolded or the membrane protein is misassembled, quality control mechanisms exist that can degrade the proteins.

The role of the membrane electrochemical potential in the translocation of acidic and basic residues across the membrane was investigated with the M13 procoat protein, which has a short periplasmic loop, and leader peptidase, which has an extended periplasmically located N‐terminal tail. For both proteins we find that the membrane potential promotes membrane transfer only when negatively charged residues are present within the translocated domain. When these residues are substituted by uncharged amino acids, the proteins insert into the membrane independently of the potential. In contrast, when a positively charged residue is present within the N‐terminal tail of leader peptidase, the potential impedes translocation of the tail domain. However, an impediment was not observed in the case of the procoat protein, where positively charged residues in the central loop are translocated even in the presence of the membrane potential. Intriguingly, several of the negatively charged procoat proteins required the SecA and SecY proteins for optimal translocation. The studies reported here provide insights into the role of the potential in membrane protein assembly and suggest that electrophoresis can play an important role in controlling membrane topology.