No abstract

The grading system described in this study is reliable for evaluating ALVAL in MoM prostheses using MR but is limited in differentiating mild disease from infection.

No abstract

MRI and MRA may be useful adjuncts in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears in adults. MRA appears to be superior to conventional MRI.

Monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT at increasing theoretical kilovoltages reduces the streak artefact produced by beam hardening from orthopaedic prostheses, accompanied by a modest increase in heterogeneity of background image attenuation, and decrease in contrast to noise ratio, but no deterioration in high contrast line pair resolution.

No abstract

Objective: To assess reliability and discriminative validity of cartilage compositional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Design: The study was carried out per PRISMA recommendations. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1974 e present) for eligible studies. We performed qualitative synthesis of reliability data. Where data from at least two discrimination studies were available, we estimated pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) between subjects with and without OA. Discrimination analyses compared controls and subjects with mild OA (KellgreneLawrence (KL) grade 1e2), severe OA (KL grade 3e4) and OA not otherwise specified (NOS) where not possible to stratify. We assessed quality of the evidence using Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tools. Results: Fifty-eight studies were included in the reliability analysis and 26 studies were included in the discrimination analysis, with data from a total of 2,007 knees. Intra-observer, inter-observer and testeretest reliability of compositional techniques were excellent with most intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8 and coefficients of variation <10%. T1rho and T2 relaxometry were significant discriminators between subjects with mild OA and controls, and between subjects with OA (NOS) and controls (P < 0.001). T1rho showed best discrimination for mild OA (SMD [95% CI] ¼ 0.73 [0.40 to 1.06], P < 0.001) and OA (NOS) (0.60 [0.41 to 0.80], P < 0.001). Quality of evidence was moderate for both parts of the review. Conclusions: Cartilage compositional MRI techniques are reliable and, in the case of T1rho and T2 relaxometry, can discriminate between subjects with OA and controls.

Although there are pathognomonic features that characterize lipofibromatous hamartoma on MRI, the range of appearances is broad. Sonography appears to show equally characteristic features and may be a useful tool for assessing this condition.