2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1956-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis

Abstract: MRI and MRA may be useful adjuncts in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears in adults. MRA appears to be superior to conventional MRI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
89
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, although several studies have reported a higher accuracy for MR arthrography in the detection of chondrolabral lesions [17,30,31], the use of intraarticular contrast might not be logistically feasible in a larger study trial and/or in clinical [32], and, more importantly, for the majority of these studies, a 1.5-T MRI system was used. In this context, recent studies have shown that the use of a high-resolution, nonarthrographic 3-T MRI is capable of detecting chondral and labral abnormalities with high accuracy [20,33,34] and therefore may obviate the need for intraarticular contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although several studies have reported a higher accuracy for MR arthrography in the detection of chondrolabral lesions [17,30,31], the use of intraarticular contrast might not be logistically feasible in a larger study trial and/or in clinical [32], and, more importantly, for the majority of these studies, a 1.5-T MRI system was used. In this context, recent studies have shown that the use of a high-resolution, nonarthrographic 3-T MRI is capable of detecting chondral and labral abnormalities with high accuracy [20,33,34] and therefore may obviate the need for intraarticular contrast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent studies find that MRA has a sensitivity of 93 -100 percent and an accuracy of 93-96 percent [30][31][32]. Metaanalysis supports the superior reliability of MRA to plain MRI, although variability and the use of small datasets were noted [33]. The accuracy of MRA may be dependent on training: for both MRA and plain MRI, the accuracy of labral tear diagnosis was 85 percent for musculoskeletal radiologists and 70 percent for general radiologists [34].…”
Section: Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation Of Labral Tearsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There has been considerable variation among studies evaluating the utility of conventional MRI to detect labral tears. A recent meta-analysis, which included 19 studies reported a pooled sensitivity of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.73) and a pooled specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.91) [18]. The same meta-analysis also compared 15 studies evaluating the test characteristics for MRA.…”
Section: Issn: 2470-9824mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The pooled sensitivity for MRA was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84 to 0.90) and pooled specificity was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.74). Interestingly, conventional MRI had a higher specificity than MRA, but MRA's higher ROC curve indicated superior overall diagnostic accuracy [18]. MRA is also superior to conventional MRI for the diagnosis of other subtle intra-articular A B Figure 5: Twenty-year-old female ballet dancer with left hip pain for one month and discordant US and MRA findings of labral tear.…”
Section: Issn: 2470-9824mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation