This study aims to explain the political party authority in withdrawing support for the regional head candidate in elections, as well as providing an understanding of sanctions that targeted political parties who withdrawn or revoked their political stance by applicable regulations. This study using a legal perspective on the authority of political parties in withdrawing support and Authority Theory, Democracy Theory, Rule of Law Theory, Decision Making Theory, and Sanction Theory as supported theories. The formulation of all arguments, facts, and theoretical frameworks in this study uses empirical normative legal research methods. Data obtained and collected through books, journals, theses, and recent dissertations, interviews, and articles related to the problem. The research method in this study combines elements of normative and empirical law and data. This research is qualitative research used in library observation. This research concludes that the authority of political parties regarding the withdrawal of support for a prospective regional head candidate pair explained in three stages or processes, including the first stage is before registering candidates to the KPU, the second stage is the stage after registering with KPU, and last is the stage after the determination of a prospective pair of candidates by the KPU. Among the existing stages, there is a full space for political parties to participate and room for the KPU to organize regional head elections. So concerning the withdrawal of support, political parties are not allowed arbitrarily to withdraw or vice versa regarding their support for prospective pairs of candidates. Referring to the applicable regulations, the forms of sanctions that can be given to political parties that withdraw or revoke a candidate pair are criminal sanctions and administrative sanctions. Where administrative sanctions are considered to be less firm against political parties, in contrast to criminal sanctions (ultimum remedium) or as a last resort that is much firmer but only aimed at the leaders or leaders of the heads of the central political parties who deliberately make withdrawals. Keyword: Political Parties, Withdrawal of Support, Prospective Regional Head Candidates.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menakar kebijakan affirmative action dalam sistem kepartaian. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum empiris yaitu penelitian tentang bekerjanya hukum (law in action) di masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kebijakan afirmasi yang ditegaskan dalam sistem kepartaian di Indonesia belum sepenuhnya dilaksanakan oleh internal partai politik. Hal ini terbukti dalam beberapa partai politik diantaranya Golkar, PKS, PAN, Demokrat, dan Nasdem yang dalam Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga belum tertuang pasal yang mengatur kuota 30% keterwakilan perempuan. Maka dapat dipastikan bahwa Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga tersebut cacat dan jika Anggaran Dasar dan Anggaran Rumah Tangga tersebut diuji dalam konteks Undang-Undang Partai Politik, maka dapat dipastikan partai tersebut melanggar. Affirmative action telah diatur dalam ketentuan nasional. Undang-Undang Partai Politik dan Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum. Namun pada tataran praktis, kebijakan tersebut belum memberikan kepastian, kemanfaatan dan keadilan.
This study aims to analyze (1) the position and duties of Non-Structural Institutions (NSI) in the institutional structure of the Republic of Indonesia and (2) the arrangement of NSI in the framework of administering the government of the Republic of Indonesia. The research method was used in the research is normative research method. The type of this research was primary and secondary data. Techniques of collecting data through literature study through books, journals, and other documents required and analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that (1) the growth of non-structural institutions is high but ironically it has not been accompanied by significant improvements in efficiency, effectiveness and performance as well as: (2) institutional growth and fragmented arrangement creates institutions to overlap in tasks and the function of inter-governmental agencies as well as raising high costs of government birocracy. Keywords: Effectiveness, Government, Non-Structural Institution AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis (1) kedudukan dan tugas Lembaga Non Struktural (LNS) dalam struktur kelembagaan Negara Republik Indonesia dan (2) penataan LNS dalam rangka penyelengaraan pemerintahan Negara Republik Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian normatif. Adapun jenis bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka melalui buku, jurnal, serta dokumen lain yang diperlukan dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) kedudukan LNS dalam Negara Republik Indonesia bersifat independen atau mandiri dalam melaksanakan tugas dan fungsinya, serta berada diluar struktur kementerian negara maupun lembaga pemerintah lainnya,.serta: (2) pentaan LNS dilakukan dalam bentuk melakukan kegiatan tertentu secara khusus dan membantu tugas pemerintahan dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang efektif. Kata Kunci: Efektivitas, Pemerintahan, Lembaga Non-Struktural
This study aims to analyze the system and mechanism of supervision of the management of the APBD and the form of implementation of the supervision of the management of the APBD in Makassar City. This research was conducted using empirical normative research methods. The data collection technique used is in the form of field research by interviewing related parties and conducting library research. The results showed that the supervision carried out by the DPRD and the Makassar City Inspectorate had not run optimally due to the many shortcomings in the supervision process. The form of implementation of supervision has been carried out well, however, there were many problems found because there were several individuals who made administrative errors such as delays in providing data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.