Background-Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) represents the gold standard for diagnosing myocarditis and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. This study focuses on the risk of complications and the respective diagnostic performance of left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV), or biventricular EMB in patients with suspected myocarditis and/or cardiomyopathy of unknown origin. Methods and Results-In this 2-center study, 755 patients with clinically suspected myocarditis (nϭ481) and/or cardiomyopathy of nonischemic origin including those with infiltrative or connective tissue disease (nϭ274) underwent either selective LV-EMB (nϭ265; 35.1%), selective RV-EMB (nϭ133; 17.6%), or biventricular EMB (nϭ357; 47.3%) after coronary angiography and exclusion of significant coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, including late gadolinium enhancement, imaging was performed in 540 patients (71.5%). The major complication rate for LV-EMB was 0.64% and for RV-EMB, 0.82%. Considering postprocedural pericardial effusion that occurred after biventricular EMB, the minor complication rate for LV-EMB varied between 0.64% to 2.89% and for RV-EMB, between 2.24% and 5.10%. Diagnostic EMB results were achieved significantly more often in those patients who underwent biventricular EMBs (79.3%) compared to those who underwent either selective LV-EMB or selective RV-EMB (67.3%; PϽ0.001). In patients with biventricular EMB, myocarditis was diagnosed in LV-EMB samples in 18.7% and in RV-EMB samples in 7.9% (Pϭ0.002) , and it was diagnosed in both ventricles in 73.4%. There were no differences in the number of positive LV-EMB, RV-EMB, or LV-and RV-EMB findings when related to the site of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based late gadolinium enhancement. Conclusions-Both

Nearly 50% of patients undergoing diagnostic angiography for assessment of stable angina had angiographically normal or near normal coronary arteriograms. The ACH test triggered epicardial or microvascular coronary spasm in nearly two-thirds of these patients. Our results suggest that abnormal coronary vasomotion plays a pathogenic role in this setting and that the ACH test might be useful to identify patients with cardiac symptoms, despite normal coronaries. (Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion in Patients With Suspected CAD But Normal Coronary Arteries; NCT00921856).

RV involvement is common in TTC and seems to be associated with a more severe impairment in LV systolic function. It may be suspected by the presence of pleural effusion.

Background-Coronary spasm can cause myocardial ischemia and angina in patients with and those without obstructive coronary artery disease. However, provocation tests using intracoronary acetylcholine administration are rarely performed in clinical routine in the United States and Europe. Thus, we assessed the clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing in white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Methods and Results-From September 2007 to June 2010, a total of 921 consecutive patients (362 men, mean age 62±12years) who underwent diagnostic angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia and were found to have unobstructed coronary arteries (no stenosis ≥50%) were enrolled. The intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing was performed directly after angiography according to a standardized protocol. Three hundred forty-six patients (35%) reported chest pain at rest, 222 (22%) reported chest pain on exertion, 238 (24%) reported a combination of effort and resting chest pain, and 41 (4%) presented with troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome. The overall frequency of epicardial spasm (>75% diameter reduction with angina and ischemic ECG shifts) was 33.4%, and the overall frequency of microvascular spasm (angina and ischemic ECG shifts without epicardial spasm) was 24.2%. Epicardial spasm was most often diffuse and located in the distal coronary segments (P<0.01

No abstract

No abstract

Coronary vasospasm is one of the main reasons for atypical chest pain in patients with clinical signs of myocarditis and biopsy-proven PVB19 myocarditis in the absence of significant CAD.

Every fourth patient with ACS had no culprit lesion. Coronary spasm could be documented in nearly 50% of the patients tested by ACH. Coronary spasm is a frequent cause of ACS and should regularly be considered as a differential diagnosis.