Not for the first time in recent history, the people of Haiti have been obliged to fall back on their resilience strategies in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew. Following the powerful earthquake that struck the country on 12 January 2010, the entire population had to find the resources to survive in the face of extensive material damage and loss of life: over 222 000 dead, more than 300 000 injured and between 4000 and 7000 amputees (UNDP, 2010).
This article explores the use of online clinical interviews in humanitarian contexts—a practice that not only builds on, updates, and adapts the interventions of psychologists and NGOs dealing with humanitarian crises, but also reflects technological advances. Psychologists working with humanitarian staff in the field can be called in to remotely conduct assessments or provide psychological support to those in need. After providing a brief overview of this relatively new practice, we describe—from a psychodynamic perspective—our own experience of conducting online clinical sessions from France (in collaboration with NGOs) with humanitarian workers directly or indirectly exposed to traumatic situations in 2 countries struck by crisis (Haiti and Syria). We highlight both the benefits and limitations of this practice, as well as the opportunities it offers for developing a new kind of therapeutic support for trauma victims. Based on our specific experiences in the field, we then make a series of clinical, methodical, and ethical recommendations for psychologists using the Internet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.