2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Resilience Scale – 14 in a sample of college students from France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…RS-14 is scored on a 7-point scale ( totally disagree to Totally agree ), with possible scores ranging from 14 to 98. The measure has excellent internal consistency (Cénat, Hébert, et al, 2018; Wagnild, 2013), including in Canada among racialized communities (Ritchie et al, 2014). The Cronbach’s α for our sample was .90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS-14 is scored on a 7-point scale ( totally disagree to Totally agree ), with possible scores ranging from 14 to 98. The measure has excellent internal consistency (Cénat, Hébert, et al, 2018; Wagnild, 2013), including in Canada among racialized communities (Ritchie et al, 2014). The Cronbach’s α for our sample was .90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the French version of the RS‐14, it was found to be suitable to be used with French peaking populations. The psychometric properties of the RS‐14 was measured in a sample of college students in France (Cénat et al, 2018). Cénat and his colleagues estimated the basic form of the French version of the RS‐14.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFA has supported a theoretically expected single-factor structure (X 2 (14) = 25.21, p = .033; CFI = .982; RMSEA = .047, 90% CI [.014, .077]; SRMR = .053), the standardized factor loadings ranged from .40 to . 65.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, at the time when the study was conceived, we were not aware of the existence of any validated French versions of brief instruments to measure resilience, such as the BRS-F [64] or RS-14 [65]. Future studies could improve the outcome measure validity by using these newer instruments.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%