No abstract

Background/Aims: Our objective is to assess donor complications in all right hepatic lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our center. Methods: Of a total of 352 liver transplantations performed, 60 were right-lobe LDLT. Most donors (88.3%) were related to the recipients. Results: Mean hospital stay was 5.4 8 0.6 days. No complications occurred due to preoperative evaluation. Most donors received one or two units of autologous blood transfusion. Only 5 (8.3%) needed nonautologous blood transfusion. Most complications were minor and treated conservatively. Bile leaks from the cut surface of the liver occurred in 5 donors (8.3%). Two patients had potentially fatal complications: perforated duodenal ulcer and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The donor with perforated ulcer developed septicemia and multiple organ failure. He was discharged from the hospital with hemiparesis due to cerebral ischemia. The patient with PVT remained asymptomatic and the portal vein was recanalized by the 3rd postoperative month. One donor died in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac arrest due to cardiac arrhythmia. Conclusion: Right hepatectomy for LDLT may be associated with significant morbidity, including death and it should be performed only by surgeons with great experience.

-Background -The polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders in women at childbearing age. Metabolic syndrome is present from 28% to 46% of patients with PCOS. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic expression of metabolic syndrome. There are few published studies that correlate PCOS and NAFLD.Objective -To determine the prevalence of NAFLD and metabolic syndrome in patients with PCOS, and to verify if there is a correlation between NAFLD and metabolic syndrome in this population.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS. Determinar a opinião e o conhecimento, de uma amostra da população da cidade de Curitiba, sobre doação e transplante de órgãos. MÉTODOS.A opinião e o conhecimento sobre doação e transplante de órgãos de mil pessoas, com idade superior a 18 anos, foram determinados através de um questionário de 20 perguntas. Os entrevistados avaliados tinham uma distribuição similar em idade, sexo e padrão socioeconômico, e escolaridade à população brasileira, determinada pelo IBGE. RESULTADOS. A maioria dos entrevistados (87,8%) era favorável à doação de órgãos. Não houve diferença na percentagem da população favorável à doação de órgãos com a relação a sexo, estado civil, religião e rendimentos. Os principais motivos para serem favoráveis à doação de órgãos foram para salvar vida, ajudar o próximo e doar vida. Os principais motivos para não serem favoráveis à doação foram falta de confiança na medicina ou no sistema de captação e distribuição de órgãos, por haver comércio de órgãos e temor de mutilação do corpo. A maioria dos entrevistados respondeu que os ricos tinham mais chances de serem transplantados do que os pobres, que existe venda de órgãos no Brasil e que existe possibilidade de erro no diagnóstico de morte encefálica estabelecido pelo médico. CONCLUSÃO. A maioria da população deste estudo é favorável à doação de órgãos e tem um bom conhecimento sobre doação e transplante de órgãos. A maioria demonstrou não confiar no sistema de distribuição de órgãos e no diagnóstico de morte encefálica. UNITERMOS

Low levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 observed in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis are corrected after OLT. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 correlate negatively with MELD.

RESUMO: Objetivo:O presente estudo tem por objetivo avaliar a anatomia arterial hepática em doadores e receptores de 150 transplantes hepáticos. Métodos: 246 pacientes foram analisados, 129 doadores e 117 receptores de fígado. Resultados: A anatomia arterial hepática era normal em 189 (76,82%) pacientes. Alterações anatômicas foram encontradas nos demais 57 (23,18%), sendo as principais: artéria hepática direita ramo da artéria mesentérica superior, artéria hepática esquerda ramo da artéria gástrica esquerda, artéria hepática direita ramo da artéria mesentérica superior associada à artéria hepática esquerda ramo da artéria gástrica esquerda e artéria hepática comum ramo da artéria mesentérica superior. Algumas anomalias raras foram visualizadas. Conclusões: Os achados deste estudo demonstram a variabilidade da anatomia do sistema arterial hepático e alertam para a necessidade de cautela nas dissecções cirúrgicas, principalmente nas captações de enxerto dos transplantes de fígado, para se evitar comprometimento do suprimento sangüíneo hepático.Descritores: Artéria hepática; Transplante hepático; Alterações anatômicas.Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões -Vol. 28 -n o 1 -13 INTRODUÇÃOO estudo da artéria hepática tem sido abordado desde a Antiguidade. Vários estudiosos como Aristóteles e Rufus teceram comentários a respeito do sistema arterial hepático, porém foi Galeno o primeiro a analisar mais detalhadamente este tópico, descrevendo que as artérias destinadas ao estômago, fígado e baço não nasciam em tronco comum na aorta como a artéria destinada ao intestino, mas, ao contrário, em dois troncos distintos 1 .Andréas Versalius, no século XVI, foi o primeiro estudioso a proporcionar descrições anatômicas superiores às de Galeno, comentando sobre a divisão em dois ramos de tronco celíaco: direito -correspondente à artéria hepá-tica e esquerdo -correspondente à artéria esplênica que forneceria ramo gástrico, a artéria gástrica esquerda.No entanto, Jacques Benigne Winslow e Albert Haller, considerados os pais da angiologia moderna, definiram corretamente a anatomia do tronco celíaco -Winslow descreven-

-Context -Presently the MELD score is used as the waiting list criterion for liver transplantation in Brazil. In this method more critical patients are considered priority to transplantation. Objective -To compare the results of liver transplantation when the chronologic waiting list was the criterion for organ allocation (pre-MELD era) with MELD score period (MELD era) in one liver transplantation unit in Brazil. Methods -The charts of the patients subjected to liver transplantation at the Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, were reviewed from January of 2001 to August of 2008. Patients were divided into two groups: pre-MELD era and MELD era. They were compared in relation to demographics of donors and receptors, etiology of cirrhosis, cold and warm ischemia time, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, MELD score and Child-Pugh score and classification at the time of transplantation, units of red blood cells transfused during the transplantation, intensive care unit stay, total hospital stay and 3 month and 1 year survival. Results -Initially, 205 liver transplantations were analyzed. Ninety four were excluded and 111 were included: 71 on the pre-MELD era and 40 on the MELD era. The two groups were comparable in relation to donors and receptors age and sex, etiology of cirrhosis and cold and warm ischemia time. The receptors of the MELD era had more hepatocellular carcinoma than those of the pre-MELD era (37.5% vs 16.9%). Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma had less advanced cirrhosis on both eras. The MELD score was the same on both eras. Excluding the cases of hepatocellular carcinoma, MELD era score was higher than pre-MELD score (18.2 vs 15.8). There were an increased number of transplants on Child-Pugh A and C and a decreased number on Child-Pugh B receptors on MELD era. Both eras had the same need of red blood cells transfusion, intensive care unit stay and hospital stay. Also, 3 month and 1 year survival were the same: 76% and 74.6% on pre-MELD era and 75% and 70.9% on MELD era. Conclusion -In our center, after the introduction of MELD score as the priority criterion for liver transplantation there were an increased number of transplants with hepatocellular carcinoma. Excluding these patients, the receptors were operated upon with more advanced cirrhosis. Nevertheless the patients had the same need for red blood cells transfusion, intensive care unit and hospital stay and 3 months and 1 year survival.

Background: Biliary reconstitution has been considered the Achilles’s heel of liver transplantations due to its high rate of postoperative complications. Aim: To evaluate the risk factors for occurrence of biliary strictures and leakages, and the most efficient methods for their treatment. Method: Of 310 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2001 and 2015, 182 medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Evaluated factors included demographic profile, type of transplantation and biliary reconstitution, presence of vascular and biliary complications, their treatment and results. Results: 153 (84.07%) deceased donor and 29 (15.93%) living donor transplantations were performed. Biliary complications occurred in 49 patients (26.92%): 28 strictures (15.38%), 14 leakages (7.7%) and seven leakages followed by strictures (3.85%). Hepatic artery thrombosis was present in 10 patients with biliary complications (20.4%; p=0,003). Percutaneous and endoscopic interventional procedures (including balloon dilation and stent insertion) were the treatment of choice for biliary complications. In case of radiological or endoscopic treatment failure, surgical intervention was performed (biliodigestive derivation or retransplantation (32.65%). Complications occurred in 25% of patients treated with endoscopic or percutaneous procedures and in 42.86% of patients reoperated. Success was achieved in 45% of patients who underwent endoscopic or percutaneous procedures and in 61.9% of those who underwent surgery. Conclusion: Biliary complications are frequent events after liver transplantation. They often require new interventions: endoscopic and percutaneous procedures at first and surgical treatment when needed. Hepatic artery thrombosis increases the number of biliary complications.