This draft clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vitamin D deficiency is an update from a previous 2016 document. An analysis of the relevant literature data was carried out, with particular attention to meta-­analyzes, randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews published over the past 5 years. The updated recommendations were discussed and revised by the leading endocrinologists of the Russian Federation, who have expert status in this issue.The classification of 25(OH)D levels has been revised (in particular, the target range of 25(OH)D values has been specified), recommendations have been developed for screening of the disorders associated with vitamin D deficiency. The concept of vitamin D-associated toxicity and recommendations for its diagnosis and prevention have been introduced. Also, indications for the assessment of other vitamin D metabolites besides 25(OH)D, the main marker of vitamin D status, have been indicated.The section regarding treatment of vitamin D deficiency has been expanded and corrected. The major additions concerned the replenishment of the vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in certain categories of patients (particularly, in the presence of the chronic kidney disease and autoimmune diseases, as well as in pregnant women) and monitoring of the effectiveness and safety of the therapy. The indications for prescribing active metabolites of vitamin D have been adjusted. Recommendations for the prevention of vitamin D deficiency in the general population have also been revised, taking into account large randomized clinical trials, meta-analyzes and systematic reviews of recent years.This publication is an expanded version of the federal guidelines.

In this prospective controlled study, we examined 25 adults with adequately controlled (HbA1c level < 8.0%) type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and 49 conditionally healthy adults, intending to reveal the diversity of vitamin D metabolism in the setting of cholecalciferol intake at a therapeutic dose. All patients received a single dose (150,000 IU) of cholecalciferol aqueous solution orally. Laboratory assessments including serum vitamin D metabolites (25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 1,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3), free 25(OH)D, vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) as well as serum and urine biochemical parameters were performed before the intake and on Days 1, 3 and 7 after the administration. The studied groups had no significant differences in baseline parameters except that the patients with diabetes showed higher baseline levels of free 25(OH)D (p < 0.05). They also lacked a correlation between the measured and calculated free 25(OH)D in contrast to the patients from the control group (r = 0.41, p > 0.05 vs. r = 0.88, p < 0.05), possibly due to the glycosylation of binding proteins, which affects the affinity constant for 25(OH)D. The elevation of vitamin D levels after the administration of cholecalciferol was comparable in both groups, with slightly higher 25(OH)D3 levels observed in the diabetes group throughout the study since Day 1 (p < 0.05). Overall, our data indicate that in patients with adequately controlled T1DM 25(OH)D3 levels and the therapeutic response to cholecalciferol is similar to that in healthy individuals.

There is increasing data regarding the association between vitamin D and COVID-19. This study aimed to reveal the alterations of vitamin D metabolism in the setting of COVID-19. We examined 119 adult COVID-19 inpatients and 44 apparently healthy adult individuals with similar serum 25OH-D3 levels as a reference group. The assessment included serum biochemical parameters (total calcium, albumin, phosphorus, creatinine), parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), vitamin D metabolites (25OH-D3, 25OH-D2, 1,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25OH-D3, 24,25(OH)2D3 and D3) and free 25OH-D. COVID-19 patients had in general very low vitamin D levels (median 25OH-D3 equals 10.8 ng/mL), accompanied by an increased production of the active vitamin D metabolite (1,25(OH)2D3), estimated as higher 1,25(OH)2D3 serum levels (61 [44; 81] vs. 40 [35; 50] pg/mL, p < 0.001) and lower 25OH-D3/1,25(OH)2D3 ratio (175 [112; 260] vs. 272 [200; 433], p < 0.001) which is presumably aimed at preventing hypocalcemia. Patients with COVID-19 also had elevated DBP (450 [386; 515] vs. 392 [311; 433] mg/L, p < 0.001) and low free 25OH-D levels (<LoB vs. 3.9 [3.2; 4.4] pg/mL, p < 0.001). Follow-up assessment of the COVID-19 inpatients showed recovery of the observed changes. Overall, hospitalized patients with an acute course of COVID-19 have not only very low levels of 25OH-D but also profound abnormalities in the metabolism of vitamin D regardless of the clinical course of the disease. These alterations might exacerbate existing vitamin D deficiency and its negative impact.

Only a few studies evaluating the metabolism of vitamin D in patients with hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT) have been performed thus far, and, in particular, they mainly investigated the process of vitamin D activation (specifically, 1α-hydroxylation). This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the extended spectrum of vitamin D metabolites in patients with HypoPT compared to healthy individuals. We examined 38 adult patients with chronic HypoPT in comparison to 38 healthy adults. The assessment included biochemical parameters (total calcium, albumin, phosphorus, creatinine, and magnesium), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D metabolites (25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 1,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 24,25(OH)2D3) in serum. Our data show that an adequate level of 25(OH)D3 (median 35.3 (29.6; 42.0) ng/mL) is achieved with standard doses of cholecalciferol (median 2000 (2000; 2500) IU per day) in HypoPT patients. They also presented with supraphysiological levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 (median 71 (47; 96) vs. 40 (34; 59) pg/mL, p < 0.001) and the increased production of inactive metabolite (median 24,25(OH)2D3 3.8 (3.0; 5.1) vs. 1.9 (1.3; 2.7) ng/mL, p < 0.001; median 25(OH)D3/24,25(OH)2D3 ratio 8.9 (7.6; 11.1) vs. 13.5 (11.1; 17.0), p < 0.001) as compared to the control group. This might be a consequence of the therapy received (treatment with activated vitamin D) and the pathophysiology of the disease (lack of PTH). The abnormality of vitamin D metabolism does not seem to interfere with the achievement of hypoparathyroidism compensation.

In this study we aimed to assess vitamin D metabolism in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD) compared to healthy individuals in the setting of bolus cholecalciferol treatment. The study group included 30 adults with active CD and the control group included 30 apparently healthy adults with similar age, sex and BMI. All participants received a single dose (150,000 IU) of cholecalciferol aqueous solution orally. Laboratory assessments including serum vitamin D metabolites (25(OH)D3, 25(OH)D2, 1,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3 and 24,25(OH)2D3), free 25(OH)D, vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) as well as serum and urine biochemical parameters were performed before the intake and on Days 1, 3 and 7 after the administration. All data were analyzed with non-parametric statistics. Patients with CD had similar to healthy controls 25(OH)D3 levels (p > 0.05) and higher 25(OH)D3/24,25(OH)2D3 ratios (p < 0.05) throughout the study. They also had lower baseline free 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.05) despite similar DBP levels (p > 0.05) and lower albumin levels (p < 0.05); 24-h urinary free cortisol showed significant correlation with baseline 25(OH)D3/24,25(OH)2D3 ratio (r = 0.36, p < 0.05). The increase in 25(OH)D3 after cholecalciferol intake was similar in obese and non-obese states and lacked correlation with BMI (p > 0.05) among patients with CD, as opposed to the control group. Overall, patients with CD have a consistently higher 25(OH)D3/24,25(OH)2D3 ratio, which is indicative of a decrease in 24-hydroxylase activity. This altered activity of the principal vitamin D catabolism might influence the effectiveness of cholecalciferol treatment. The observed difference in baseline free 25(OH)D levels is not entirely clear and requires further study.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(ОН)D]) deficiency (<20 ng/mL) and insufficiency (20–29 ng/mL) are common in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), but data regarding the vitamin D metabolism in this population is limited.AIM: The aim of this study is to estimate the vitamin D metabolites and their relationship with the main parameters of phosphorus-calcium metabolism in patients with PHPT at baseline and on the background of a single dose of cholecalciferol 150,000 IU.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center interventional, dynamic, prospective, comparative study has been carried out. The study included 54 participants, divided into two groups: the 1st group included 27 patients with confirmed PHPT, the 2nd control group (n = 27), matched on gender (p = 0.062). The study included 4 visits; the baseline laboratory examination and a bolus dose of cholecalciferol were performed at the visit 1, the subsequent visits included a dynamic laboratory examination.RESULTS: Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/ml) was detected in 69% of patients with PHPT. In the PHPT group (before cholecalciferol therapy), there was a direct association of 1.25(OH)2 D3 with albumin-corrected and ionized calcium, as well as between the 25(OH)D3 /24.25(OH)2 D3 ratio with PTH and magnesium. After taking of cholecalciferol, the levels of 1.25(OH)2 D3 and 25(OH)D3 /24.25(OH)2 D3 were significantly increased, and the levels of 25(OH)D3 /1.25(OH)2 D3 were significantly declined at all visits among patients with PHPT. The common 25(OH)D level was comparable to the control group, however the levels of 1,25(OH)2 D3 in patients with PHPT were 55% higher at baseline, and after taking of cholecalciferol 150,000 IU. They remained increased by 3–7 days by an additional 23–36%, significantly higher than those in the control group: 44%, 74% and 65%, at visits 2, 3 and 4, respectively (p<0.05). The taking of 150,000 IU cholecalciferol in the PHPT group did not lead to a significant increase in hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, which indicates the safety of this dose in patients with mild hypercalcemia (albumin corrected calcium <3 mmol/l). None of the study participants experienced any side effects.CONCLUSION: The completely comprehensive assessment of vitamin D metabolites was carried out for the first time in patients with PHPT before and after using a bolus dose of cholecalciferol. The results confirmed the differences of vitamin D metabolism in chronic excessive secretion of PTH compared to control group, which is new data in the pathogenesis of the disease, and can be used to develop optimal regimens for cholecalciferol taking in this population.

No abstract