In recent years there have been an increasing number of in vitro and in vivo studies that show positive results regarding antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) used in dentistry. These include applications in periodontics, endodontics, and mucosal infections caused by bacteria present as biofilms. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy is a therapy based on the combination of a non-toxic photosensitizer (PS) and appropriate wavelength visible light, which in the presence of oxygen is activated to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS induce a series of photochemical and biological events that cause irreversible damage leading to the death of microorganisms. Many light-absorbing dyes have been mentioned as potential PS for aPDT and different wavelengths have been tested. However, there is no consensus on a standard protocol yet. Thus, the goal of this review was to summarize the results of research on aPDT in dentistry using the PubMed database focusing on recent studies of the effectiveness aPDT in decreasing microorganisms and microbial biofilms, and also to describe aPDT effects, mechanisms of action and applications.
This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles incorporated into self-cured glass ionomer cement (GIC) and light-cured resin-reinforced GIC on Streptococcus mutans biofilm. The GICs, Fuji II (GC America) and Fuji II LC (GC America), were incorporated with nanoparticles at concentrations of 0%, 1%, and 2% by weight, and the biofilm maturation time was one and seven days. Circular specimens of each GIC type were prepared. The antibacterial activity was evaluated by determining the number of colony forming units of S. mutans strain per milliliter. Morphology of the biofilm was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data obtained for each GIC were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α = 5%). For chemically activated GIC, no significant difference was observed in relation to the time of biofilm maturation (p = 0.744), concentration of nanoparticles (p = 0.966), and their interaction (p = 0.800). The results from analysis of GIC modified by light-polymerized resin showed that only of the maturing time significantly affected the number of adhered cells on the biofilm (p = 0.034, F = 4.778). The more mature the biofilm, higher the number of cells. SEM analysis showed no change in cell morphology in relation to the type of GIC, maturation time, and nanoparticles concentration. We conclude that the inclusion of zinc oxide nanoparticles at concentrations of 1% and 2% by weight into the GICs evaluated here, did not promote their antimicrobial activity against S. mutans.
Objective This study aimed at evaluating the degree of conversion (DC) of four composite
resins, being one nanofilled and 3 microhybrid resins, photo-activated with
second- and third-generation light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Material and methods FiltekTM Z350 nanofilled composite resins and Amelogen®
Plus, Vit-l-escenceTM and Opallis microhybrid resins were
photo-activated with two second-generation LEDs (Radii-cal and Elipar Free
LightTM 2) and one third-generation LED (Ultra-Lume LED 5) by
continuous light mode, and a quartz halogen-tungsten bulb (QHT, control). After 24
h of storage, the samples were pulverized into fine powder and 5 mg of each
material were mixed with 100 mg of potassium bromide (KBr). After homogenization,
they were pressed, which resulted in a pellet that was evaluated using an infrared
spectromer (Nexus 470, Thermo Nicolet) equipped with TGS detector using diffuse
reflectance (32 scans, resolution of 4 cm-1) coupled to a computer. The
percentage of unreacted carbon-carbon double bonds (% C=C) was determined from the
ratio of absorbance intensities of aliphatic C=C (peak at 1637 cm-1) against
internal standard before and after curing of the specimen: aromatic C-C (peak at
1610 cm-1). Results The ANOVA showed a significant effect on the interaction between the light-curing
units (LCUs) and the composite resins (p<0.001). The Tukey's test showed that
the nanofilled resin (FiltekTM Z350) and Opallis when photo-activated
by the halogen lamp (QTH) had the lowest DC compared with the other microhybrid
composite resins. The DC of the nanofilled resin (FiltekTM Z350) was
also lower using LEDs. The highest degrees of conversion were obtained using the
third-generation LED and one of second-generation LEDs (Elipar Free
LightTM 2). Conclusions The nanofilled resin showed the lowest DC, and the Vit-l-escenceTM
microhybrid composite resin showed the highest DC. Among the LCUs, it was not
possible to establish an order, even though the second-generation LED Radii-cal
provided the lowest DC.
Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the color changes and microhardness of a
nanocomposite after four bleaching regimens. Materials. Twenty-five specimens (n = 25) were made with a nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme XT). The specimens were divided into five
groups equally (n = 5): bleaching groups and control group, as follows: G1: artificial saliva at 37°C; (control) G2: hydrogen peroxide (HP) at 7%; G3: hydrogen peroxide (HP) at 35%; G4: carbamide peroxide (CP) at
10%; G5: carbamide peroxide (CP) 35%. Color measurements were made
with spectrophotometer using CIELAB color scale. The Vickers hardness (VHN) measurements
were performed at the top surface. The data were analyzed with two-way Analysis of Variance. Results. ΔE and VHN mean values into the groups were not statistically different,
however, the VHN mean values before and after storage and bleaching showed statistically
significant differences. Conclusion. Nanocomposite samples showed no significant alteration
(color and microhardness) after bleaching. Thus, no replacement of restorations is required after
bleaching.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.