In our study cohort, liver disease was stable or improving in most of the patients, and development of progressive hepatic symptoms while under treatment was a rare event. The development of new symptoms while under treatment or progression of pre-existing symptoms was more often recorded for neurological than for hepatic symptoms.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Prothrombin time is thought to be unreliable in cirrhotic patients to predict the risk of bleeding. We investigated whether prothrombin time ratio was an independent risk factor for bleeding alongside its clot waveform analysis. Methods We studied 307 consecutive cirrhotic patients and 115 healthy subjects. A coagulometer was used for detecting both prothrombin time and clot waveform analysis which included velocity (1st derivative) and acceleration (2nd derivative) of clot formation, and area of parabolic segment of the 1st and 2nd derivatives of prothrombin time (entire cycle of the clot formation). Results Logistic regression shows that prothrombin time ratio was the only variable significantly associated with the history of bleeding. Using a hemorrhagic score, the stepwise model included prothrombin time ratio and the area of parabolic segment of the 1st derivative of Prothrombin Time. Odds ratio was used to create a new score to be challenged against the hemorrhagic score in a ROC analysis. The AUC was 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67‐0.77. Conclusion Prothrombin time ratio is associated to an increased bleeding risk. Its role may be further emphasized considering clot waveform analysis. The new score, if aggregated to prothrombin time ratio, could be useful to provide a single parameter immediately ready to assess the bleeding risk in the individual cirrhotic patient.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS. Determination of hepatic copper (Cu) concentration is important in Wilson's disease (WD) diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate uneven distribution of liver Cu concentration and the utility of double-sample biopsy in WD diagnosis. METHODS. Thirty-five WD patients (20 male; mean age 41 ± 9 years) were enrolled in the study and double-liver samples for biopsy were obtained. A further 30 WD patients, in whom Cu determination was performed using single-liver samples, were also enrolled as controls. RESULTS. A marked difference in hepatic Cu concentration was observed between the two sample groups (p < 0.0001). This difference is statistically significant for all levels of liver fibrosis (p < 0.001) and for the comparison of hepatic and neurological phenotypes (p < 0.01). The sensitivity of the Cu concentrations obtained from the double-sample biopsies for the conventional cut-off value of 250 mg/g dry weight of tissue was 85.7% compared to 80% in the single-sample biopsies. By lowering the cut-off value from 250 to 50 µg/g of dry weight of tissue, the sensitivity of Cu content to diagnose WD increased to 97% for double-sample liver biopsy compared to 93% for single-sample liver biopsy. CONCLUSIONS. Liver Cu content was unevenly distributed in the WD subjects, irrespective of fibrosis levels and disease phenotypes; hence WD can be misdiagnosed using single-sample liver Cu measurement. Double-sample biopsy sensitivity is greater than that obtained with single-sample biopsy and should therefore be considered to evaluate liver Cu concentration at initial diagnosis in all patients.

Two opposing tendencies seem to be present in cirrhotic disease: the first shows a weakness of clot formation while the second a predisposition towards thrombosis, identified by the PPS.