BackgroundNon-surgical treatment has generally been recommended for stage II medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in preference to surgery. However, non-surgical treatment is not empirically effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgical or non-surgical treatment leads to better outcomes for stage II MRONJ.Material and MethodsIn this retrospective study, surgery was performed in a total of 28 patients while 24 patients underwent non-surgical treatment. The outcomes of both treatment approaches after 6 months were evaluated and statistically compared. In addition, risk factors for surgical and non-surgical treatments were assessed for each.ResultsSurgical treatment in 25 patients (89.3%) resulted in success, with failure in 3 patients (10.7%). Non-surgical treatment was successful for 8 patients (33.3%) and failed in 16 patients (66.7%). There was therefore a significant difference between surgical and non-surgical treatment outcomes (P<0.01). Regarding risk factors, in non-surgical treatment primary diseases, medications, and drug holiday had a significant effect on outcomes (P<0.01). Risk factors for surgical treatment could not be clarified.ConclusionsSurgical treatment is more effective than non-surgical treatment for stage II MRONJ, and drug holiday, primary disease, and medication constitute risk factors in non-surgical treatment. Key words:Bisphosphonate, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, denosumab, management, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

No abstract

It is not widely known that incorrect use of oral bisphosphonates (BPs), such as chewing the medication, can cause oral ulcers. An 83‐year‐old woman with dementia was referred to our clinic with multiple oral ulcers. Blood and histopathological examinations were inconclusive. Further questioning revealed that the patient chewed the oral BP, resulting in oral ulceration. Patients with loss of cognitive function, such as dementia, are at risk of oral ulcers caused by incorrect use of BPs.

No abstract

Rationale:Oral adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is rare and its origins are controversial. We here present a patient with oral ASC that developed after surgery for oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).Patient concerns:A 70-year-old man with SCC on the oral floor underwent surgical resection. However, the enlarged ulcer presented on the oral floor 9 month after surgery.Diagnoses:The biopsy of the ulcer revealed a SCC. Imaging examinations detected enhancement of a large lesion expanded to the tongue, but no evidence of regional lymph node or distant metastasis was shown. Based on these results, local recurrence of the cancer was diagnosed (cT4aN0M0).Interventions:The surgery for the recurrent tumor was performed.Outcomes:The pathological examination of the surgical specimen indicated recurrent tumor was ASC. Thus, histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses of both the initial SCC and the subsequent ASC were performed in an attempt to explore the origin of the ASC. As the results, pathological review of both tumors suggested the subsequent ASC was developed from the tumor cells with adenoid phenotype in the initial SCC.Lessons:This report suggests that the oral ASC was origin from the oral SCC, which can contribute to new knowledge for pathogenesis of oral cancer.

No abstract

Physicians should raise awareness of malignant external otitis in immunosuppressed patients with oral cancer after radiotherapy.

Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) is histopathologically characterized by papillary proliferation of vascular endothelial cells. IPEH in the mandible is very rare, such that only four affected patients have been described in the English-language medical literature. Thus, there is a poor understanding of the pathogenesis and clinical features of IPEH in the mandible. This case report describes a patient with IPEH in the mandible who had a history of repeated trauma involving the mandible due to boxing-related and baseball-related injuries. Imaging examinations had diagnostic limitations, in that they showed a multilocular radiolucency suggestive of a simple bone cyst of the mandible, whereas intraoperative findings revealed a fluid-free unicystic cavity lined by a thin red membrane. Thus, histopathologic examinations were necessary for definitive diagnosis. The specimen demonstrated a spongy structure consisting of many small papillary fibrous tissues, lined by a typical monolayer endothelium that expressed CD34, but did not express D2-40 or AE1/AE3. Moreover, the Ki-67 labeling index was <1%. Thus, the lesion was identified as intraosseous IPEH in the mandible. Although the pathogenesis of IPEH has been controversial, our findings in this case suggest that pathogenesis of IPEH may be related to a history of trauma.