No abstract

Introduction and aim To investigate the effect of the prognostic nutritional index on treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the treatment modalities; the demographic, clinical and pathological features of 396 patients with RCC and prognostic nutritional index. Based on the median value, patients were grouped as having low and high prognostic nutritional index values. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and Cox-regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis. Results The median overall survival was 39 months (95% CI 26.1–51.8), 28 months (95% CI 17.9–38) and 7 months (95% CI 4.7–9.2) in patients with favorable, intermediate and poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk group, respectively. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0001). Overall survival was 11 months (95% CI 7.5–14.5) in the low-prognostic nutritional index (prognostic nutritional index ≤38.5) group, and 41 months (95% CI 30.5–51.4) in the high prognostic nutritional index (prognostic nutritional index >38.5) group (p < 0.001). In Cox regression analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (HR: 2.5), time to systemic treatment (HR: 1.7) and prognostic nutritional index (HR: 1.8) were associated with overall survival. Conclusion In patients with renal cell cancer, prognostic nutritional index is closely related to survival and has prognostic significance.

Glucocorticoids are used for the treatment of many diseases, such as inflammatory, allergic, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases. They can be used in the form of topical, oral, inhalable, rectal, and intra-articular agents. Many topical steroid-related iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome cases affecting especially children have been reported in the literature. Topical steroid-related Cushing's syndrome is rarely seen in adults. In this report, we present the case of a 32-year-old male patient with iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome related to long-term clobetasol propionate treatment for psoriasis. In the context of such treatment, the glucocorticoid withdrawal problem has to be overcome. At present there is no consensus on steroid withdrawal. Patients on long-term glucocorticoid treatment must be evaluated for potential adverse effects and withdrawal symptoms by their physician and their endocrinologist.

Purpose: We aimed to identify the prognostic and predictive values of post-treatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and PNI dynamics in nasopharyngeal cancer patients (NPC) in this study.Methods: 107 non-metastatic NPC patients were included. PNI was calculated by using the following formula: [10 x serum albumin value (gr/dL)] + [0.005 x total lymphocyte count (per mm3)]. ROC analysis was used for determining prognostic PNI values and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses for prognostic characterization of PNI.Results: The statistically signi cant cut-off values for pre-and post-treatment PNI were 50.65 and 44.75, respectively. Of the pre-treatment PNI analysis, PNI≤50.65 group had shorter loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, for post-treatment PNI analysis, PNI≤44.75 group had shorter LRRFS and OS. In univariate analysis, only pretreatment PNI was associated with LRRFS and DMFS, while pre-and post-treatment PNI were both associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, both PNI were independent prognostic markers for OS. In the combined analysis, pre-and post-treatment PNI, differences between the groups were statistically signi cant, and the PNI dynamics was an independent prognostic indicator for OS.Conclusion: PNI is a useful, independent prognostic marker for non-metastatic NPC patients. It is used for either pre-or post-treatment patients. Furthermore, changes in pre-treatment PNI value after curative treatment is a signi cant indicator for OS.

Introduction: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody–drug conjugate and its survival advantage has been shown in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer. However, clinical trials underrepresent patients ⩾65 years of age, leading to a lack of information in this population. We analyzed the real-world outcomes of older women who were treated with T-DM1 therapy. Methods: We performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective analysis of patients aged ⩾65 years treated with T-DM1. A total of 93 patients from 10 cancer centers were involved in the study. Our goal was to determine the survival, response rates, and toxicity profile in T-DM1–treated patients, as well as the factors that influence survival. Results: Median follow-up was 12.2 months. Objective response rate was 29%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.47 and 15.0 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score 2 was found to be an independent prognostic factor for worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81, p = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.33, p = 0.006). Any adverse event (AE) was seen in 92.5% of patients; grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 30.1%. Dose reduction or treatment discontinuation rates were 11.8% and 6.5%, respectively. Conclusion: The efficacy of T-DM1 was acceptable and it was generally well-tolerated among older patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

Background To describe the prognostic value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and its effect on survival in in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients. The cut-off value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio was specified as “3” which is mostly close—and also clinically easily applicable—to the median neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio level of our study group. High group is identified as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio >3 (n = 160) and low group is identified as neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio ≤3 (n = 163). Results A total of 331 (with 211 male and 120 female) patients were enrolled to study. The median age of the patients was 58. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score is calculated for the 72.8% (n = 241) of the study group and among these patients, favorable, intermediate, and poor risk rates were 22, 45.2, and 32.8%. The total usage of tyrosine kinase inhibitors reached 78% of the patients. The median overall survival was 32 months versus 11 months in the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio low and high groups, respectively (HR: 0.49 (95% CI 0.37–0.65), p < 0.001). Conclusion In conclusion, the pre-treatment value of elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio might be a predictor of poor overall survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients.

Aim: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and liver metastases are frequent during its course. Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score/grade was shown to predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of the ALBI score/grade in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. Methods: Medical records of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous or metachronous liver metastases were reviewed. Serum albumin, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, carcinoembryogenic antigen and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the time of first liver metastasis were determined. ALBI score was calculated from serum albumin and bilirubin and was graded. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate prognostic factors. Results: The study included 223 patients. Median overall survival was 23.9, 16.0 and 4.0 months for ALBI grades 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P<0.001). In the first multivariate model, serum albumin was an independent prognostic factor (Hazard ratio=1.97, P=0.001) but total bilirubin was not (Hazard ratio=1.43, P=0.17). In the second multivariate analysis, ALBI grade was a significant predictor of overall survival (Hazard ratio=1.54, P=0.02 for ALBI grade 2 and Hazard ratio=3.85, P<0.001 for ALBI grade 3). Conclusion: ALBI grade may be a valuable prognostic method to estimate the mortality of patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

No abstract