This article explores the development of concepts related to the 'quality of employment' in the academic literature in terms of their definition, methodological progress, and ongoing policy debates. Over time, these concepts have evolved from simple studies of job satisfaction towards more comprehensive measures of job and employment quality, including the ILO's concept of 'Decent Work' launched in 1999. This paper compares the parallel development of quality of employment measures in the European Union with the ILO's Decent Work agenda and concludes that the former has advanced much further due to more consistent efforts to generate internationally comparable data on labour markets, which permit detailed measurements and international comparisons. In contrast, Decent Work remains a very broadly defined concept, which is impossible to measure across countries. We conclude by proposing three important differences between these two scenarios that have lead to such diverging paths: the lack of availability of internationally comparable data, the control over the research agenda by partisan social actors, and a prematurely mandated definition of Decent Work which is extremely vague and all-encompassing 1 .
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
Artículo de publicación ISIThis article examines the impact of the International Labour Organization’s
concept of Decent Work on development thinking and the academic literature.
We attempt to answer the question of what makes a development initiative
successful by comparing the decent work approach to the United Nation
Development Programme’s Human Development concept (in conjunction
with the human development indicator). We consider that the latter has
been one of the most successful development concepts ever to have been
launched, while the impact of decent work by comparison has been limited.
Our hypothesis relating to the question of what makes a development initiative
successful has three fundamental components: first, a solid theoretical
foundation has to justify the launch of a development concept. A second vital
factor is the availability of sufficient national and internationally comparable
data that enables researchers and policy makers alike to apply the concept,
preferably by means of a synthetic indicator. Third, the political will and
institutional structure of the development institution that launches a concept
is a key factor, particularly if data availability is limited as countries then
have to be persuaded to generate new data
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.