IntroductionThe POInT study, an investigator initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre primary prevention trial is conducted to determine whether daily administration of oral insulin, from age 4.0 months to 7.0 months until age 36.0 months to children with elevated genetic risk for type 1 diabetes, reduces the incidence of beta-cell autoantibodies and diabetes.Methods and analysisInfants aged 4.0 to 7.0 months from Germany, Poland, Belgium, UK and Sweden are eligible if they have a >10.0% expected risk for developing multiple beta-cell autoantibodies as determined by genetic risk score or family history and human leucocyte antigen genotype. Infants are randomised 1:1 to daily oral insulin (7.5 mg for 2 months, 22.5 mg for 2 months, 67.5 mg until age 36.0 months) or placebo, and followed for a maximum of 7 years. Treatment and follow-up is stopped if a child develops diabetes. The primary outcome is the development of persistent confirmed multiple beta-cell autoantibodies or diabetes. Other outcomes are: (1) Any persistent confirmed beta-cell autoantibody (glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA), IA-2A, autoantibodies to insulin (IAA) and zinc transporter 8 or tetraspanin 7), or diabetes, (2) Persistent confirmed IAA, (3) Persistent confirmed GADA and (4) Abnormal glucose tolerance or diabetes.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the ethical committees of all participating clinical sites. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations and will be openly shared after completion of the trial.Trial registration numberNCT03364868.
ObjectiveType 1 diabetes can be identified by the presence of beta-cell autoantibodies that often arise in the first few years of life. The purpose of this perspective is to present the case for primary prevention of beta-cell autoimmunity and to provide a study design for its implementation in Europe.MethodsWe examined and summarized recruitment strategies, enrollment rates, and outcomes in published TRIGR, FINDIA and BABYDIET primary prevention trials, and the TEDDY intensive observational study. A proposal for a recruitment and implementation strategy to perform a phase II/III primary prevention randomized controlled trial in infants with genetic risk for developing beta-cell autoimmunity is outlined.ResultsInfants with a family history of type 1 diabetes (TRIGR, BABYDIET, TEDDY) and infants younger than age 3 months from the general population (FINDIA, TEDDY) were enrolled into these studies. All studies used HLA genotyping as part of their eligibility criteria. Predicted beta-cell autoimmunity risk in the eligible infants ranged from 3% (FINDIA, TEDDY general population) up to 12% (TRIGR, BABYDIET). Amongst eligible infants, participation was between 38% (TEDDY general population) and 97% (FINDIA). Outcomes, defined as multiple beta-cell autoantibodies, were consistent with predicted risks. We subsequently modeled recruitment into a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that could assess the efficacy of oral insulin treatment as adapted from the Pre-POINT pilot trial. The RCT would recruit infants with and without a first-degree family history of type 1 diabetes and be based on general population genetic risk testing. HLA genotyping and, for the general population, genotyping at additional type 1 diabetes susceptibility SNPs would be used to identify children with around 10% risk of beta-cell autoimmunity. The proposed RCT would have 80% power to detect a 50% reduction in multiple beta-cell autoantibodies by age 4 years at a two-tailed alpha of 0.05, and would randomize around 1160 infants to oral insulin or placebo arms in order to fulfill this. It is estimated that recruitment would require testing of between 400,000 and 500,000 newborns or infants.ConclusionIt is timely and feasible to establish a platform for primary prevention trials for type 1 diabetes in Europe. This multi-site European infrastructure would perform RCTs, supply data coordination and biorepository, provide cohorts for mechanistic and observational studies, and increase awareness for autoimmune diabetes.
Aims/hypothesis The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of autoantibodies to IA-2β (IA2βA) in a large, well-characterised population of islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive relatives followed for 5 years in the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial. Methods Autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) and IA-2 (IA2A) were measured in 549 participants at study entry, and IA2A-positive samples tested for IA2βA. First-phase insulin response (FPIR) and oral glucose tolerance were determined at baseline. Results Of 212 ICA/IA2A-positive participants (median age 12.1 years; 57% male), 113 developed diabetes (5 year cumulative risk 56%), and 148 were also GADA-positive and IAA-positive (4Ab-positive). IA2βA were detected in 137 (65%) ICA/IA2A-positive participants and were associated with an increased 5 year diabetes risk (IA2βA-positive 65 vs 39% in IA2βA-negative, p=0.0002). The effect was most marked in 4Ab-positive relatives (72% vs 52%, p=0.003). Metabolic testing further refined risk assessment. Among 101 4Ab-positive relatives with IA2βA, the 5 year risk was 94% in those with a low FPIR (vs 50% in those with a normal FPIR, p<0.0001), and 95% in those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (vs 66% in those with normal glucose tolerance, p<0.0001). The median time to diagnosis of 4Ab/IA2βA-positive participants with a low FPIR was 1.5 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed IA2βA status, antibody number, young age, FPIR and IGT as independent determinants of risk. Conclusions/interpretation IA2βA are associated with a very high risk of diabetes in ICA/IA2A-positive relatives. Testing for IA2A/IA2βA compares favourably with the IVGTT in identifying a subgroup of autoantibody-positive relatives at increased risk. IA2βA determination should be added to screening protocols of future intervention trials.
These data are consistent with a reduced capacity to make IL-4 promoted antibody responses to exogenous antigen in early pre-diabetes.
Mothers with gestational diabetes, especially mothers with insulin-dependent gestational diabetes, and obese mothers breastfed their children significantly less and for a shorter duration than healthy mothers. These findings could explain the higher risk of their children developing obesity later in life and should be considered when counselling women with gestational diabetes.
Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder, characterised by a loss of self-tolerance to endocrine tissues, chronic candidiasis and ectodermal disorders. APECED is associated with mutations of a single gene, designated autoimmune regulator (AIRE). We describe a 31-year-old APECED patient with non-traumatic, cutaneous ulcers on both forearms with features of a lupus-like panniculitis. On admission to the ICU in September 2001, the patient suffered from a ketoacidotic, hyperglycemic coma and adrenal crisis due to an Enterobacter-cloacae sepsis, originating from multiple, necrotising deep cutaneous ulcers. These ulcers spontaneously developed on both forearms, some of which were just emerging, full blown or healing with scars. Histological examination showed signs of a scarring panniculitis and vasculitis. Immunohistochemistry and direct immunofluorescence with characterisation of immunoglobulin and complement-factor binding pattern revealed features of a lupus-like panniculitis. Sequence analysis of all 14 exons of the AIRE gene revealed a R257 X mutation in exon 6 resulting in a nonsense mutation at codon 257 confirming the diagnosis of APECED. Oral treatment with 60 mg/day corticosteroids for two weeks led to complete resolution of all ulcers. In conclusion, mutations in the AIRE gene may provide the genetic background against which additional factors can initiate an autoimmune process. Here, autoimmune panniculitis appears to be an associated feature of the APECED syndrome. Our findings support the use of immunosuppressive therapy for autoimmune disease components of the APECED syndrome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.