Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1933
DOI: 10.1007/bf01937560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zur entwicklungsphysiologie der schraubigen blattstellung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1947
1947
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Schmucker (1933), double or bilobed leaflets were common on rachises bearing both odd-and even-numbered leaflets. A bilobed leaflet formed when a lateral leaflet was partially fused with the terminal leaflet, appeared to be dissected from the side of the terminal leaflet, or exhibited any condition in between.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As noted by Schmucker (1933), double or bilobed leaflets were common on rachises bearing both odd-and even-numbered leaflets. A bilobed leaflet formed when a lateral leaflet was partially fused with the terminal leaflet, appeared to be dissected from the side of the terminal leaflet, or exhibited any condition in between.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, as observed in other species with decussate phyllotaxis (Rutishauser 1981), one leaf of a pair may sometimes be inserted at a slightly higher level in the node. In stump sprouts of Fraxinus excelsior, Schmucker (1933) observed transformations from decussate to helical phyllotaxis. The helical pattern was present in the winter bud and it was often expressed for several seasons before reverting to the normal pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose to give the name 'repulsion theory' to the theory that each new leaf arises at the greatest possible distance from the slightly older leaves which form the uppermost cycle round the apex. Suggestions of this kind were made by Schmucker (1933) and by Priestley & Scott (1933), who wrongly attributed the same idea to Hofmeister (1868); and the idea has probably occurred at some time to most people interested. Different from this is the theory for which we claim to have produced evidence previously (1931,1933,1935), that each new leaf arises in the first available space on the apex above and between the existing leaves or other contact members in the top cycle-that is to say, in the first space which attains both some necessary width and some necessary distance below the extreme growing-point.…”
Section: The Repulsion Theory and The Theory Of The First Available Smentioning
confidence: 99%