Dedicated to Professor Thomas B. RauchfussRecently we reported the preparation of heterobimetallic sulfides that contained aluminum atoms [LAl(m-S) 2 MCp 2 ] (M = Ti, 1; M = Zr, 2; L = HC[C(Me)N(2,6-iPr 2 C 6 H 3 )] 2 ; Cp = C 5 H 5 ).[1] The X-ray crystal structural analysis of the titanium compound 1 confirmed the presence of a highly strained {Al(m-S) 2 Ti} four-membered ring (S-Al-S 102.5(1), Al-S-Ti 84.7(1) and 83.6(1), S-Ti-S 89.3(1)8). The ring strain and the short Al···Ti separation (3.118 ) prompted us to examine the reactivity of 1 and 2 with water in expectation of a nucleophilic attack that would lead to the opening of the ring and to the isolation of compounds containing the {LAl(EH)(m-E)M(EH)Cp 2 } framework (E = O or S depending on the degree of hydrolysis). Such species could serve as unique precursors for the preparation of trimetallic systems comparable with the alumoxane [(m-O) Although a few dinuclear systems that contain the {M'(EH)-(m-E)M(EH)} arrangement have been described (M' = Al, [2] Fe, [3a] Ge, [3b,c] ) none has been structurally characterized that contains two different metal atoms stabilized by organic ligands.The addition of two equivalents of water to a solution of 1 or 2 in THF at room temperature led, after overnight stirring, to the precipitation of a crystalline material. H 2 S was identified as a by-product. The solid product was filtered off, dried in vacuo, and isolated as pale brown (Ti) or pale yellow (Zr) microcrystals. The 1 H NMR spectroscopic, EI mass spectrometric, and X-ray crystal structural analysis of these products confirmed that the ring-opening reaction had occurred, but revealed the presence of two derivatives in the samples The driving force for this intramolecular rearrangement is the high oxophilicity of the metal centers and the higher stability of the {Al-O-Ti} frame compared to {Al-S-Ti}.