2010
DOI: 10.1108/03090561011020507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young people and voting behaviour: alienated youth and (or) an interested and critical citizenry?

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of trust, cynicism and efficacy on young peoples' (non)voting behaviour during the 2005 British general election.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were gathered from 1,134 interviewer‐administered questionnaires with young first‐time voters during the three‐week period following the British general election in May 2005. Validated attitudes statements were used to measure their levels of trust, cynicism and efficacy.FindingsThe research shows that y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
53
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(62 reference statements)
10
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is particularly greatest and demonstrates that the voters' attitude toward PML-N is mainly dependent on the party loyalty and the contribution of socialization process in shaping the attitude of voters is comparatively less than the voters' loyalty with PML-N. The model data also confirms the significant and positive relation with attitude toward party and voting preferences this finding confirms the study result of many researchers including Cwalina, Falkowski, Newman, 2010;Dermody, Lloyd and Scullion, 2010;Choi and Kim, (2012).…”
Section: Structural Equation Modeling For Pml (N)supporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This value is particularly greatest and demonstrates that the voters' attitude toward PML-N is mainly dependent on the party loyalty and the contribution of socialization process in shaping the attitude of voters is comparatively less than the voters' loyalty with PML-N. The model data also confirms the significant and positive relation with attitude toward party and voting preferences this finding confirms the study result of many researchers including Cwalina, Falkowski, Newman, 2010;Dermody, Lloyd and Scullion, 2010;Choi and Kim, (2012).…”
Section: Structural Equation Modeling For Pml (N)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…This value is particularly greatest and demonstrates that the voters' attitude toward PTI is mainly dependent on the party loyalty and the contribution of socialization process in shaping the attitude of voters is comparatively less than the voters' loyalty with PTI. The model data also confirms the significant and positive relation with attitude toward party and voting preferences this finding confirms the study result of many researchers including Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee, 1954;Campbell et al, 1960;Hillygus and Jackman, 2003;Holbrook and McClurg, 2005;Wielhouwer, 2006;Elmer et al, (2009) ;Cwalina, Falkowski, Newman, 2010;Dermody, Lloyd and Scullion, 2010;Choi and Kim, (2012). The magnitude of the value (1.022) indicates that the attitude of voters toward PTI reasonably affects the voting preferences.…”
Section: Structural Equation Modeling For Ptisupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internationally, young people's lower rates of voting participation have often been attributed to declining interest in politics over time. Qualitative research conducted in Britain indicates that it is not that young people are disinterested in politics as such, but rather they feel 'disillusioned with, and alienated from formal politics' (O'Toole et al 2005: 59; see also Dermody, Hanmer-Lloyd and Scullion 2010;Henn, Weinstein and Wring 2002). Other studies have also refuted the accusations that young people are politically apathetic (Loader 2007).…”
Section: Modes Of Political Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this segment constituted the weakest supporting group of the UK Conservative Party from 1992 to 2009 (Worcester et al 2011). it was also considered the most disengaged of all the electoral segments (Dermody et al 2010). Therefore, this segment of voters was considered an appropriate sample to frame the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%