1993
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Children's Human Figure Drawings and Cognitive Development

Abstract: The age-stage relationship between young children's human figure drawings and Piaget's levels of cognitive development was investigated using 45 young children ages 4 through 6 years. Analyses indicated a distinct monotonic trend between cognitive stage and drawing level; as cognitive ability increased so did drawing level. This suggests that children's human figure drawings can be a simple tool for the quick assessment of cognitive levels in young children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When design copy was parsed from draw‐a‐person and draw‐a‐profile in the British Birth Cohort Study, it was the strongest fine motor predictor of later mathematics and reading (Grissmer et al., 2010). This is notable because the draw‐a‐person task has traditionally been considered a proxy for overall cognitive ability (Chappell & Steitz, 1993), but perhaps less reliably so for the current generation (Willcock, Imuta, & Hayne, 2011). In another study, children who could copy designs well at kindergarten entry had higher teacher‐rated reading, writing, math, and spelling through third grade (Taylor Kulp, 1999).…”
Section: Links Between Fine Motor Skills and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When design copy was parsed from draw‐a‐person and draw‐a‐profile in the British Birth Cohort Study, it was the strongest fine motor predictor of later mathematics and reading (Grissmer et al., 2010). This is notable because the draw‐a‐person task has traditionally been considered a proxy for overall cognitive ability (Chappell & Steitz, 1993), but perhaps less reliably so for the current generation (Willcock, Imuta, & Hayne, 2011). In another study, children who could copy designs well at kindergarten entry had higher teacher‐rated reading, writing, math, and spelling through third grade (Taylor Kulp, 1999).…”
Section: Links Between Fine Motor Skills and Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the evidence for a relationship between children's drawings and intelligence comes mainly from the pioneering work of Piaget and Inhelder (1948), who set the stage for later studies by describing basic developmental stages of drawing. The type of intelligence being referred to here is Piagetian; it would conform to Piaget's definition of intelligence (Chappell & Steitz, 1993).…”
Section: /Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chappell and Steitz (1993) found a significant relationship between Piagetian stages of development and levels of human figure drawing. Cox and Howarth (1989) reported significant differences in drawing by normal children and by children with developmental delays lagging 4 years behind normal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%