1996
DOI: 10.1080/00103629609369631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and nutrient mapping for site specific fertilizer management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within-field yield variation is typically attributed to variability in soil texture, changes in landscape position, cropping history, soil physical and chemical properties, and nutrient availability across fields (Wibawa et al, 1993;Penny 1996). However, these generalizations regarding the source of variability are not always supported by other research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Within-field yield variation is typically attributed to variability in soil texture, changes in landscape position, cropping history, soil physical and chemical properties, and nutrient availability across fields (Wibawa et al, 1993;Penny 1996). However, these generalizations regarding the source of variability are not always supported by other research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Soil characteristics vary from point to point within a field and have impact on the use, fate, and transport of chemical inputs as well as on crop yield (Jaynes et al, 1995). Mulla et al (1992) reported that soil-fertility variations can be so extensive that some portions of a field require no fertilizer application, while others require significant N or P. The large variations found in nutrient levels and crop yields support the need for variable rate fertilization (Penny et al, 1996).…”
Section: Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated that a constant rate of N applied based on a composite sample of the field would result in over fertilization of the areas with high levels of N and under fertihzation of large areas with low levels of available N. Penney et al (1996) also refers to the fact that the cost of intensive grid sampling is high and alternative methods are needed for mapping the spatial variability of soil nutrients. According to Han et al (1994), if a field is subdivided into small enough regions (grid cells), the soill properties within the regions will be uniform, hence, application rates and actual soil productivity are closely matched.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a composite sample estimates the mean soil test nutrient level which does not address the variability encountered in that field (Raun et aI., 1998), Wibawa et al (1993) Penney et al (1996) also evaluated nutrient variability using grid sampling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%