2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/21/305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray reflectivity of multilayers with non-continuous interfaces

Abstract: X-ray specular reflectivity and diffuse scattering calculated using the traditional multilayer model, which assumes continuous, non-intersecting interfaces, are capable of fitting the experimental data obtained on multilayers with non-continuous interfaces. However, wrong refined electron densities and interface roughness are the consequence of an inappropriate structure model. A modification of the Parratt optical formalism combined with the application of the distorted-wave Born approximation was suggeste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given that the major contribution to our GISAXS signal steams from the high reflectivity of our samples, we must account for this reflectivity. Therefore the problem was tackled with an approach using the recursive layer-by-layer Parrat formalism [23,[25][26][27][28][29][30] which is briefly recalled in Section 3.3) to evaluate the Fresnel coefficients. A log-normal size distribution function for the height accounted for the perpendicular disorder.…”
Section: The Elba Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, given that the major contribution to our GISAXS signal steams from the high reflectivity of our samples, we must account for this reflectivity. Therefore the problem was tackled with an approach using the recursive layer-by-layer Parrat formalism [23,[25][26][27][28][29][30] which is briefly recalled in Section 3.3) to evaluate the Fresnel coefficients. A log-normal size distribution function for the height accounted for the perpendicular disorder.…”
Section: The Elba Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflectivity coefficients used in the DWBA formalism are calculated within recursive layer-by-layer Parrat formalism [23,[25][26][27][28][29][30], which is briefly recalled in Section 3.3). Thus, the total scattered intensity is:…”
Section: The Full Dwba Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The free parameters of the multilayer model were the electron densities and thicknesses of individual layers, the root-mean-squared (rms) roughness of the interfaces and the rms roughness of the sample surface. For the calculation, the classical optical theory of Xray reflection [22][23][24] in the implementation from [25] was used.…”
Section: Preferred Orientation Of Crystallites In the Pt Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 The progressive decrease in the NM/M optical contrast and of the best-fit quality following the decrease in t Co could be possibly due to Co-Cu interdiffusion or to the fragmentation process of the layers. 38 However, layers undulations 39,40 may appear during sample growth due to, e.g., shadowing effects. 9,41 In our case, these undulations are actually observed ͓see Fig.…”
Section: B Layer Planarity and Co Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%