X-ray photon Compton scattering by an atom with<i>d</i>symmetry in the core

Hopersky, A. N.; Nadolinsky, A. M.; Ikoeva, K. Kh.; Khoroshavina, O. A.

doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/14/145202

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, highly accurate experimental ISFFs or GOSs can be used to test theoretical models and calculational codes rigorously [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For carbon monoxide, most previous experiments concentrated mainly on measurements of differ ential cross sections (DCSs) or GOSs of valence-shell excita tions utilizing the electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) method.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Squared form factors for theA1ΠandB1Σ+vibronic bands of carbon monoxide studied by high-resolution inelastic x-ray scattering

Yang

et al. 2015

Phys. Rev. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using the inelastic x-ray scattering with a high resolution of 70 meV, squared form factors of molecular carbon monoxide have been determined from the ground state X 'Z + to the vibronic states of A 'FI and B 'Z L Since the first Born approximation is satisfied in inelastic x-ray scattering, the inelastic squared form factors of the valence-shell excitations of carbon monoxide measured by this work not only provide the experimental benchmark data but also serve as the high-energy limit for the electron impact method. Based on the present experimental results, the validity conditions of the previous electron impact works are discussed. It is found that for the excitations of A 'FI(v' = 0-6) the first Born approximation is reached in the region of q2 < 0.7 a.u. at an impact electron energy of 1.5 keV, while for B '£ +(v' = 0) the first Born approximation does not fully hold at the impact electron energy of 1.5 keV except for the q 2 < 0.15 a.u. The large discrepancies between the present inelastic x-ray scattering results and the theoretical calculations for most transitions suggest that the formerly reported calculations are not accurate enough.

show abstract