2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.212402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray imaging of vortex cores in confined magnetic structures

Abstract: Cores of magnetic vortices in micron-sized NiFe disk structures, with thicknesses between 150 and 50 nm, were imaged and analysed by high resolution magnetic soft X-ray microscopy. A decrease of the vortex core radius was observed, from ∼ 38 to 18 nm with decreasing disk thickness. By comparing with full 3D micromagnetic simulations showing the well-known barrel structure, we obtained excellent agreement taking into account instrumental broadening and a small perpendicular anisotropy. The proven magnetic spati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vortices have a winding number of n = + 1 and a polarity of p = ± 1, whereas antivortices have n = − 1 (refs 1-3). Magnetic vortices are characterized by an in-plane curling magnetization (chirality) and a nanometer-sized central region with an out-of-plane magnetization (polarity) [4][5][6] . The latter is defined by a clockwise (c = 1) or counter-clockwise (c = − 1) rotation of the in-plane magnetization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vortices have a winding number of n = + 1 and a polarity of p = ± 1, whereas antivortices have n = − 1 (refs 1-3). Magnetic vortices are characterized by an in-plane curling magnetization (chirality) and a nanometer-sized central region with an out-of-plane magnetization (polarity) [4][5][6] . The latter is defined by a clockwise (c = 1) or counter-clockwise (c = − 1) rotation of the in-plane magnetization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first approach consists in directly mapping the sample magnetization, which implies sending and collecting back test particles whose interaction with matter has a magnetization-dependent term. This approach provides the highest spatial resolution to date, down to the atomic scale for spin-polarized scanning tunnelling microscopy 2 and about 10 nm in transmission X-ray microscopy 3 . However, these techniques require highly complex experimental apparatus and a dedicated sample preparation so that the particles can reach and escape from the tested region without perturbations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, simulations and experiments with larger films and, consequently, longer relaxation times, would be useful. For experimental investigation, time-resolved x-ray imaging techniques should have good enough spatial and temporal resolutions (25-30 nm and 70-100 ps, respectively) [39][40][41] to observe the defects and their dynamics. Even though these resolutions are still limited when compared to our simulations, the longer relaxation times and larger interdefect separations expected during the later stages of the relaxation process in larger films (e.g., with linear sizes in the range of tens of microns) should make it possible to experimentally observe the approximate time evolution of the vortex-antivortex number densities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%