2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2737368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WTI Crude Oil Option-Implied VaR and CVaR: An Empirical Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there has been much interest also in other functionals of the risk neutral distribution. Barone Adesi (2016) suggested to consider implicit Value at Risk and implicit Expected Shortfall, and extensive empirical analysis on S&P500 Index and WTI crude oil options have been provided in Barone Adesi et al (2016a) and Barone Adesi et al (2016b). Elyasiani et al (2016) introduced a risk-asymmetry index based on the normalized difference of positive and negative corridor implied volatilities and studied its empirical properties on FTSE MIB index options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been much interest also in other functionals of the risk neutral distribution. Barone Adesi (2016) suggested to consider implicit Value at Risk and implicit Expected Shortfall, and extensive empirical analysis on S&P500 Index and WTI crude oil options have been provided in Barone Adesi et al (2016a) and Barone Adesi et al (2016b). Elyasiani et al (2016) introduced a risk-asymmetry index based on the normalized difference of positive and negative corridor implied volatilities and studied its empirical properties on FTSE MIB index options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VaR value of this strike is 0.26 that is much lower than those of ITM strike values. Barone-Adesi et al, (2016) extracted the 2014-2015 daily option implied VaR and CVaR from the WTI prices and the writing options. They were able to anticipate unexpected changes in the distribution of returns, which would have been unpredictable with standard models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%