Workplace authenticity as an attribute of employer attractiveness

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relevance of authenticity as a possible attribute of employer attractiveness. Additionally, the study compares authenticity to other factors of attractiveness, such as economic, development, social, interest and application values. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted with a total of 937 respondents. The questionnaire consisted of the employer attractiveness scale developed by Berthon, Ewing, and Hah (2005) and an adapted version of the authentic living scale (Wood et al., 2008). Findings The results show that workplace authenticity is equally valued as an attractiveness attribute as having opportunities for economic and personal development, and that it is significantly more highly valued than other attractiveness dimensions of the work environment, such as interest value, social value, and application value. The results also show that authenticity matters more as an attribute of attractiveness for top management, older professionals as well as women. Practical implications The findings suggest that firms become more competitive in attracting talent if their recruitment strategies place more emphasis on authenticity as a psychological benefit that can be obtained through working in the company. The use of social media (e.g. employee testimonials, chats, and blogs) can help to this end. Originality/value The subject of workplace authenticity has been receiving increasing attention in the academic literature, and the studies reveal the benefits that it may entail for both developing and retaining a more engaged and productive workforce. However, previous research has not considered how perceptions of workplace authenticity may also help organizations become more attractive in the eyes of potential job applicants.

Designing job ads to stimulate the decision to apply: a discrete choice experiment with business students

“…Although not generated from longitudinal data, this questions research arguing that stable job preferences are a positive illusion due to the individual need to act consistently (Wells & Iyengar, 2005). Furthermore, it supports research that finds relatively stable preferences for core job attributes even across career stages (Reis et al, 2017).…”

Understanding employees’ responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic: The attractiveness of healthcare jobs

“…At the same time, COVID-19 was measured based on the study by Shammi, Bodrud-Doza, Islam, and Rahman (2020), including variables such as mental health condition, the health system in Iraq, governance and political issues, socioeconomic issues, immediate emerging issues, and enduring emerging issues, with a total of 17 items for measurement. Employees' attitudes were measured using 17 items (Reis, Braga, & Trullen, 2017) classified as social value, interest value, application value, development value, and economic value. The attractiveness of healthcare occupations was determined through the three-item scale of Gomes and Neves (2011).…”

Quality of work life and Generation Y

“…The lack of research in this area is surprising, as different organizational types bring different advantages. Knowing and articulating these advantages in relation to job satisfaction 10 and, ultimately, understanding how they appeal to different employees, is most relevant for an organization's overall attractiveness and employer branding activities (e.g., Reis et al, 2017).…”