1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00418.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory Capacity Dissociates Lexical and Sentential Context Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
89
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(13 reference statements)
15
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the empirical data and the simulations are thus an instantiation of Myerson et al's (1990) claim that cognitive slowing, even if it is a general phenomenon, will not affect all behaviors equally; more complex processes (context use, in this case) will be impaired by slowing to a greater degree than simpler processes (frequency use). These results are also broadly consistent with studies of individual differences in comprehension efficiency in young adults and children, where less skilled comprehenders (assessed by performance on comprehension or verbal working memory tests or both) show limited or slower use of contextual information relative to more efficient comprehenders (Gernsbacher, Varner, & Faust, 1990;Merrill, Sperber, & McCauley, 1981;Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995;Van Petten, Weckerly, McIsaac, & Kutas, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Both the empirical data and the simulations are thus an instantiation of Myerson et al's (1990) claim that cognitive slowing, even if it is a general phenomenon, will not affect all behaviors equally; more complex processes (context use, in this case) will be impaired by slowing to a greater degree than simpler processes (frequency use). These results are also broadly consistent with studies of individual differences in comprehension efficiency in young adults and children, where less skilled comprehenders (assessed by performance on comprehension or verbal working memory tests or both) show limited or slower use of contextual information relative to more efficient comprehenders (Gernsbacher, Varner, & Faust, 1990;Merrill, Sperber, & McCauley, 1981;Pearlmutter & MacDonald, 1995;Van Petten, Weckerly, McIsaac, & Kutas, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Patients with schizophrenia generated only very small late positivities, suggesting that they processed only the relationships among individual words (breakfast-eggs-eat), without creating a higher-level representation of the complete sentence. This pattern of results presents an intriguing parallel to that observed in healthy participants, in which those with high and low working memory capacity were equally sensitive to word-pair relationships within sentences, but the ERPs of low-capacity individuals showed little sign of sentence-level congruity effects (Van Petten et al, 1997).…”
Section: Neurocognitive Analyses Of Complex Symptomssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Some aspects of verbal ability -particularly working memory capacity -have also been correlated with amplitudes and/or latencies of sentence-level N400s (Gunter et al, 1995;Van Petten et al, 1997;D'Arcy et al, 2005). Thus, it is also advisable to match groups on level of formal education.…”
Section: Page 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'The box is biting the mailman') individuals with low working memory spans elicit an N400 (reflecting lexical/semantic processing) while individuals with high working memory spans elicit a P600 (reflecting combinatorial processes). Similarly, Van Petten, Weckerly, McIsaac and Kutas (1997) showed that individuals with low working memory capacity were less able than individuals with medium or high working memory capacity to use sentence context to facilitate word integration (as indicated by N400 modulations), though they were equally good at using lexical relationships between words. Taken together, these findings suggest that individuals with low working memory capacity may be limited in their ability to interpret events in a discourse according to a counterfactual model of the world.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%